• @AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Another consideration is hills. Pedaling up even a modest 10% incline (which isn’t exactly uncommon in mountainous cities) is already kind of hard unless you’re a sport cyclist, and on really steep hills your best bet might actually be to walk while pushing the bike (speaking from experience living in a mountainous city). This is just on a regular bike, where you can stand up to pedal in order to get more power. The Velo designs I’ve seen are such that you have to pedal in a full sitting position with your legs pushing something in front of your centre mass, instead of directly below it. I can’t imagine you can get a lot of power with that design. You also can’t easily push a Velo while walking like you can a bike, and a bike also has the benefit of allowling seemlessly connect to public transit using bike racks on busses and bike spaces on trains.

    • @federico3@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I can’t imagine you can get a lot of power with that design

      It’s the opposite. All recumbent bikes allow for higher power output.

  • @AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    IMO, the biggest issue is that it’s way slower (and less crash-safe) than a car, and way less flexible than a regular two-wheel bike. So it’s kind of the worst of both worlds from a practicality standpoint.

  • SudoDnfDashY
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    It’s better than a car, but one of the main appeals of a bike is that it takes up so little space. Most people, if they were going to abandon their cars, would opt for a regular or electric bike.