• mcgravier@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    154
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Starlink was specifically agreed for civilian use only. It’s the Ukraine who tries to breach that agreement, SpaceX simply doesn’t want to be accused of exporting weapons

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      88
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a bullshit excuse used by Melon’s fan boys.

      Whether the technology is restricted by ITAR isn’t based whether it was ever used as a weapon, but whether the US government thinks it can be used as a weapon.

      • AssPennies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the US government was left scrambling to get a formal contract in for Ukrainian access after Musk started to publicly spout pro kremlin shit. So there’s no way an ITAR argument could fly: the DoD wanted a contract to help ensure starlink availability for fucks sake, especially since Musk proved unreliable and a useful idiot for Putin’s wildest assplay desires.

        • mcgravier@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          46
          ·
          1 year ago

          DoD wanted a contract to help ensure starlink availability for fucks sake

          Contract for civilian use mind you. Strapping starlinks to kamikaze drones is a whole different story

          • YeetPics
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Ah yes, the Department of Defense.

            Famous for overseeing many civilian contracts including Netflix accounts, Comcast accounts and my subscription to Highlights magazine (I like the word searches).

      • mcgravier@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        but whether the US government thinks it can be used as a weapon.

        That’s even worse because US government can change it’s stance on starlink any time - which would be disaster for SpaceX

    • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, if a much larger country was invading, shelling apartment buildings, mining the fuck out of farmland and murdering thousands of people, I’d probably breach a ToS.

      Also, that sounds a bit absurd considering he just got the US DoD to pay for Ukraine’s starlink service.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also that larger country is firing missiles from ships in the Black Sea, and many of those missiles do kill civilians.

        Also using those ships to disrupt grain shipments which is causing issues with the food supply world wide.

        • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah, but Elron saved us ALL from nuclear war. A typical grandiose and pretentious statement for him, I suppose.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Español
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it wasn’t. The Pentagon pays for the service explicitly as military aid to Ukraine. Since, you know, Russia blew up a lot of Ukrainian infrastructure.