• Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do any of them actually have 300 mile range? Like an actual human being can drive them on real roads for 300 miles without charging?

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Behold, Bjørn Nyland’s test result spreadsheet.

      It depends on how heavy your foot is, really. Hilariously, the FCEV Mirai doesn’t top the charts, especially for high speeds.

      Mostly when people see the price of top end EVs they decide that they aren’t in that much of a hurry and taking a break every couple of hours would be okay. Same thing happens when you put an expensive battery swap station next to a cheap fast charger, people look at the price difference and decide they aren’t in that much of a hurry.

      But this guy who’s off his meds thinks people will pay a premium for hydrogen instead of just peeing and stretching their legs while they wait.

      Personally, my 200 mile EV has taken me everywhere I’ve wanted to go and when I stop and charge it’s ready to go again before I am.

      • sugartits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Personally, my 200 mile EV has taken me everywhere I’ve wanted to go and when I stop and charge it’s ready to go again before I am.

        And that’s the key.

        As long as EV range > Bladder range and they charge fast enough that the toilet break time is similar to charging time, then it doesn’t matter.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It just feels like way too low to me. Maybe you’re right and it’s not, but nowadays I get some 600 km (some 370 miles according to Google) from my petrol-based car for a full tank and I’m quite used to that.

        Anyway, to paraphrase you a bit, I’ve looked at the prices of EVs and decided I’m not in that much of a hurry to switch to them.

        • zurohki@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The main difference is you mostly don’t take them somewhere special to fill them up, so you aren’t thinking about “how long before I have to fill up again”.

          An EV charges overnight and starts off each day with a full charge, so it’s all about daily usage and long trips. Going days without charging isn’t a useful thing to do, where filling a gas car every day would be a pain in the ass.

          Prices are still fairly high, but they’re dropping fast and the used market is picking up steam.

    • Hypx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      A few, very expensive BEVs do. Think Lucid Air and the like. But they’re not economically viable vehicles.

      • Nudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        And a brand new, cutting edge hydrogen vehicle is economically viable? Your arguments are all retarded man lol

        • Hypx@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          An FCEV is able to do 400 miles at a much lower price right now. And that’s with very low rate of production.

            • Hypx@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              It will be soon. It’s already cheaper than similarly long-ranged BEVs. It is simply in an earlier state of adoption.