• Crul@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read it as a critique of human tribalism. As if aliens came and helped those they encountered, their enemies would see it as an offence to them.

          • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sounds like you view the people with the tribalism gene as “them” and those who don’t carry that gene as “us”. Perhaps you are more tribalist than you think…

            I’m being a bit cheeky but I honestly do think humanity would be better off if we acknowledged that certain character flaws are fundamental to human nature, rather than pretending that there are “good” people and “bad” people.

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s the paradox of tolerance sadly. If they insist on being tribal then they’re insisting of being removed from the whole. And I care about the whole.

          • Azzu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Are you sure about that? I think those that “do not have it” have just reframed all of humanity to be their “tribe”, i.e. they still have it, just not “using” it

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That would imply that they’d be willing to be against aliens or other non human sentient species. I disagree with that assumption.

              Though maybe we’ve just defined our tribe as literally every living thing? But that doesn’t seem right to me.

              • Azzu@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                What I mean is, how do you know that the tribalism gene is gone? I’m pretty sure that if the people that “have no tribalism gene” grew up in an environment where tribalism was normal, they would have developed the traits just like everyone else.

                It’s very arrogant to assume someone who is not acting in a tribalistic way has in some way a different biological make-up, as if they were some kind of more advanced lifeform. It’s very likely pretty much the same genetic code, just expressed differently through environmental factors.

                • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Where tribalism is normal? That’s literally everywhere. Do you have a favorite sports team? I don’t. Do you have a religion that you think is right? Not me.

                  I’m a member of groups, of course, but I feel no urge that these groups are somehow better or more than others.

                  Now, is it genetic or learned? Who knows. I was just replying to the guy who said it was a gene. I guarantee no research shows that’s a thing.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If aliens showed up and beamed a bunch of food and diapers into the hood. There is a large portion of humanity that would get mad at the aliens for helping black people, instead of being happy that aliens helped anyone at all

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would have been funnier if the guys shooting him had a diverse cast like the US Army, The Taliban, and some Chinese Assassin, instead of some generic dessert dudes with guns.

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can comics just be funny? Why does everyone have to try and make some deep political point?

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you ever considered that people who do their best to look away from bad things happening are, in fact, enabling those events in the first place?

      Try being more involved in the world around you. Who knows, you might make it a better place.

    • Stoneykins [any]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Can comments just be funny? Why does everyone have to try and make some deep point?

      Really though why should a broad medium like comics need to be limited in tone and theme? Just because you like unserious comics? Serious comics don’t stop those from existing.

        • LifeInOregon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Divine Comedy

          Words come to mean different things at different times. Ever read a “comic book”? Not all (or most) are funny. Cartoons in newspapers have historically been all over the place in mood but been referred to broadly as comics or funnies. The name implies a format, not a mood.

    • Draghetta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Least self centered American over here, thinking the whole world is about their “shitface #1 vs shitface #2” pseudodemocracy

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have no idea what you’re trying to say or why anyone writes “most past-participle-ed noun”. It’s not even a sentence.

          The Internet is such a weird place. Is the goal to see who can be the most cryptic while also at the same time knowing that someone will understand?

          • Draghetta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you really don’t get the “least/most adjective category” meme, I will explain - and therefore ruin - the joke:

            Let’s imagine a category of people, an eminent trait of said category, and an element exhibiting it. For example the Italians are known to be fanatical about food orthodoxy, and you spot online an Italian guy raging about the wrong shape of pasta being used for carbonara.

            You comment: [this guy here is the] “least fanatic Italian”, implying that as fanatical as this guy is, the others are worse.

            What have you achieved? With only three words you have insulted his category (Italians are a bunch of fanatics) and the guy himself, by reducing him to a stereotype. Two offenses in three words, an excellent ratio. Just to be clear though, most of the time these are not used to mean the insult in a really insulting manner - it’s more of a banter.

            It’s a pretty common way to insult people online, I’m surprised you haven’t encountered it much. Hope I helped.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Thanks for explaining! I’ve seen it many many times, but never quite understood the nuances you just wrote out. I always thought it was something sarcastic that I didn’t get.