• Farid@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That Firefox logo was simplified, but not oversimplified. Even with a very small icon size you can still tell it’s a fox that is (on?) fire. The Firefox Family logo is oversimplified, just being a swoosh, basically.

    • bleistift2@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      I beg to differ. Until now I never noticed the fox in the logo. And even now that I know it’s there I have a hard time finding it. And I’m looking at a version of almost 1cm on my screen.

      • Farid@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Well, I suppose it makes sense that it doesn’t apply to everyone, but my guess is that the majority can still see the fox.
        Either way, the simplification of modern logos is a necessity, because they are used in small UI elements, often even appearing monochrome. At which point they still need to be recognizable. Whether they are simplified in a good or bad way, is subjective though.

  • soapyplasm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 months ago

    The Reddit one looks like if they made a mobile game that’s just another Candy Crush clone.

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    If they didn’t change the firefox logo, it’d definitely look extremely dated today though

  • lipilee@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    We should call them “oversimplication” and “overcomplification”. Would convey the meaning better :)

  • Hubi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The new reddit logo is pretty awful but both Firefox logos are fine IMO. They are both pretty well done, just in different styles.

    • verysoft@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yup, the design for Firefox’s logo is just a million times better than reddit’s, simplification arguments aside. FF just did a much better job.

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    Just me, or does anyone else see “zombie eyes” in the new reddit logo?

  • Hugucinogens@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I used to not like the new Firefox logo when it first came out, but by now, I couldn’t do with the old one, it looks so much… And I bet if they changed it back, it would take me 2 months max to switch opinions right back.

    At some point I have to accept, I’m just an ape of habit.

    • BlanK0@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Honestly, its considered a hot-take but I do like minimalistic logos cause they are easier to recognize. Also they tend to better fit with the rest of the UI and products.

      • Kissaki@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It all depends on context. The Firefox logo is good and fine as a brand logo you can put on the product website, big enough, or the about dialog. But as an application icon I dislike it. I would prefer a simpler, more recognizable, flat-colored version.

  • dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Just looking at the thumbnail of this post reveals to me that reddit has takgen a bad step. An icon which scales well and is highly recognizable changed to something that looks like a badly generated figure which is way less recognizable. The added colors will make it look worse on different colored backgrounds as well. Not great.

  • Octopus1348@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Let’s talk about this stupid “Let’s put a useless white background under our icons” trend.

    Be honest, which looks better?

  • kidney_bean@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I liked the new Firefox logo when it came out, but I think now I would appreciate it if logos became a little more sophisticated again.