In the same way, the company that created the LLM may protect their work

What does the company protect here? The system, or the model? Which the latter being ill-gotten by scraping already copyrighted content?

Who drew the art is of no import when the artist isn’t a sentient lifeform

It was an allegory. The supposed artist is the commissioner and the LLM being the artist. And since you can’t copyright something you didn’t made, well tough luck getting copyright on AI slop.

By your definition, a photographer cannot own a picture because the camera captured it.

No, because as a photographer you hold the tool in your hand. You can adjust everything, even the subject. And its all in your own control and it takes your skill in managing it to shoot the perfect photo.

If we would take your interpretation of my definition, then nobody can own anything since they always have to use a tool to create something.

but its just a photocopy of the leaves, not the actual leaves. And to photograph something, you capture it according to your will. What will be the light situation, from which angle, at what focal length,… so many options.

You can copyright a combination of words, though, and it was his unique combination that created the art

so its literature, then?

The artist doesn’t copyright the palette, and the shop that sold the pigments holds no ownership over the painting.

Sure, the artist doesn’t copyright a palette, or the shop does not hold ownership of pigments. But Companies do patent pigments.

If the art is created with paint, pixels, or phrase, the final product belongs to the artist, and so should be protected by law for them.

If you commission an Art piece, with a detailed description of what it should display. The artist comes back to you with a draft, you tell them to adjust here and there, and you finally after several rounds of drafting got the commissioned art piece. Did you draw it?

Thats what LLMs do and nothing else.

because it was an expression of his creativity.

yeaaaah no chief, that ain’t it.

Uhm, I’ve never watched Lucifer. So I had no thoughts of that character to begin with.

More like creative bullshitting.

It seems that Mitchell was simply an astronaut not an engineer.

Ja kein Plan. In der Nähe von wo ich aufgewachsen bin wurde in den 00ern-10ern ein großer Windpark (22 MW) errichtet, konnte man dann schön von der Autobahn sehen. Ich fands toll, aber auch damals hatte ich mitbekommen wie einige aus dem Windpark anliegenden Dorf dagegen waren.

well to be frank, they had a time machine and used it after the Allies were about to crush the Kremlin.

yay!

But I have to admit, my first thought was about Mr. Lampkin of BSG, and only the second thought was about Badger.

Ja, finde ich richtig gut.

It’s interesting how you can easily identify Mark Sheppard even with face bumps.

hoffentlich bekommen wir die kurve.

so say we all.

Klar die Idee kannst du nicht damit töten. Die wehrhafte Demokratie muss IMMER aufmerksam sein.

Weil in Bier Östrogen ist.

Die Gefahr hätte einfach früher erkannt werden müssen. Wie lang existiert die AgD nun?

Wenn diese unterschätzt wird, hilft halt auch kein Eilantrag.

Ein Lichtblick? Omg.

Okay wir stellen bei all den Vollpfosten einen stark radioaktiven Container und oder eine Kohleverbrennung hin finden die wahrscheinlich besser, oder?

Oh in deren Weltbild ist es definitiv nach unten treten.

Ein Gefühl von Macht und Stärke.

He will lead us to the rusty spoons.