• 6 Posts
Joined 10M ago
Cake day: Aug 12, 2022


Lmao i’m in your wall and closet, and fridge, and don’t you dare to open the fishcan.

Looks like a lot of unnecessary extra steps for worse effect.

It is incredibly ironic though because back in the days photography was attacked as the thing that would “destroy art”.

Sidenote, but this guy could definitely use some DPRK help, his necromancer botched the spell:

God forbid Russia respond to an hostile takeovers of countries on their front door.

Bruh, NATO country was attacked just one time, and that one time NATO didn’t get involved even. It’s purely aggressive alliance.

Yeah, unfortunately socialism needs a constant upholding, as Lenin said, winning the revolution is easiest part, truly hard parts come later. Especially when the enemies are waiting for opportunity.

Pole here: Poland joined for four reasons:

  1. It is pretty much mandatory if you want to join EU (note that we had referendum about joining EU but nobody asked us if we want to join NATO)

  2. You can always count on Poland trying to become western Europe, it’s a constant for over 1000 years by now, we join all institutions located there is possible. It’s also combined with massive inferiority complex.

  3. Russophobia is alongside anticommunism the absolute ideologic pillar of current Polish state, it’s basically reflexive at this point. Fun fact: if anything, it’s a proof of how even in the 90’s NATO was clearly still aimed against Russia.

  4. Last but not least, opportunism, NATO totally looked as the victor back then, hell it still looks like this when you’re in the bubble.

And so, the propheciesed fall of the BRICKS before the unstoppable might of ICC must be put on some hold, best to ask Gordon Chang.

Contrary to other victims though, they can stop it at any time, or at least could if our resident euro enthusiasts were correct about European states sovereignity.

Well you can see that even in USA where reps accuse dems of being Chinese agents and dems accuse reps of being Russian agents, and i think “IF ONLY”.

What and aggresively placed country, right in the middle of all those NATO bases!

It must be because 81% of armed conflicts in the world since 1945 was either started or meddled in by Russia.

No wait, it’s the USA.

Yeah, it’s undoubtedly the idea behing this, especially looking at pretty clearly false results for Poland for example - idk who they asked but a lot of people here do have doubts, and the support for Ukraine is far from universal (it’s only universal in media and politicians but that’s hardly surprising considering how they are the keepers of the polish information bubble) - as you could observe few months ago when pro Ukrianian manifestations were attended by merely few dozen thousands people in entire country. Which for something that was organized and supported by vast array of central and local government institutions is truly pathetic.

But they still admitted that not everyone is supporting their propaganda, something that was unthinkable even few months ago when all antiwar protesters in Europe were proclaimed “Putin’s agents” by media.

Wew, US DoS, NATO, all manners of Visegrad imperialist stooges. Mainly Slovak ones.

So here you have, your point - when warmongers are publishing data about their war being unpopular despite their own crazy propaganda campaign it means something is maybe changing there.

Unless it’s a curated anticommunist history. I knew a literal history professors in university who were fully reactionary.

I love how the liberals always cite digital goods and also all manners of digital scam as a proof marxism is obsolete “Marx did not predicted digital goods! Future! Capitalism finally works!”, while commies are telling them with slightly bored voices that not only it’s still applicable to everything but the digital goods when pondered about just a little show the complete nonsense of capitalism even more than physical ones.

Adding “and friends” somehow make that “analysis” even more infantile. Rest of what you wrote is again, pure propaganda identical in polish and USA media, completely ignoring history. Yes, that include “NATO bad also”, very old centrist technique to push leftists into the support of imperialism.

There is no “also”. Western imperialism is the prime contradiction now.

No, Putin is not the one responsible for this war. Firstly, reducting entire conditions and situation to “Putin want” is by itself completely infantile and should be full stop. Secondly, did you perhaps missed continous USA agreesion at Russia and Soviet Union since 1917 and the catastrophic turn of events after 1991 with numerous escalations by NATO expansion, aggressive manouver, military encirclements and coups/attempts in many countries bordering Russia?

This is what you won’t ever hear in polish media.

To get back that cocaine with swastikas posted here yesterday?

Prigozhin invoking Stalin and threatening Putin with revolution is somehow both more and less amusing i thought. More because it’s a time somebody should talk about it and less because he don’t really mean it.

Considering for what they are adding people that list is gonna turn very weird after the arms flow will stop.

I remember when govt implemented similar law about public drinking in Poland, they specifically mentioned that paper bags are not enough to circumvent it.

Compared to how much they spend on it and how much the people need to pay extra on top of what they already paid in taxes, they have pretty much least efficient healthcare on Earth.

Without even an excuse of living in a country that is extremely poor and wartorn (not to mention quite a lot of countries which are extremely poor and wartorn are like that because of USA in the first place).

I’m not passive agressive, i’m just agressive at you duplicious bootlickers.

I explained that in the other posts so don’t play idiot. Especially read the Parenti quote, it’s crusty old Cold War method.

No, we don’t seem to agree on this, you constantly push propaganda of the imperialist core, you are very much pro capitalism in its highest stage.

OP entire post history is just attacking the opponents of US, idk how you can even interpret the post title otherwise, since it’s not even the title of linked article, but the one made precisely with certain agenda in mind.

Try to even chose “profitable” and “career” in the late 80’s and 90’s Poland ffs.

But of course this detail will be omitted in loaded posts like OP. Consider the still active modus operandi of western shills:

“During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.” ― Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism

I thought they were flairs at first and was disappointed they aren’t.

conservative populist platform Ordinary People and Independent Personalities (OL’aNO)

It’s been over 30 years and the sneering names of political parties in the post socialist countries never fail to shock me.

Anarchists and ultras are not gonna like this one. Though i bet they will just ignore it and went back to their usual centrist mantras.