It’s one thing to have differing views, but I’ve seen enough attempted reddit migrations to be relieved that the popular communities in the fediverse so far haven’t been about crazy racist stuff or other extreme right bullshit.

I am also glad that I’m getting away from reddit’s general political shitposting, which was more left leaning. You couldn’t have any proper discourse on there, and even I with my generally more left leaning views recognized that.

  • Suddenmoose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reddit was filled with a special brand of retards always trying to police language always acting smug about taking about some weird moral high road it is exhausting to deal with. People irl dont have such tight asses about speech. And permabanning someone for having an opinion you dont agree with is an abuse of power (not like it matters much to people who are so zealous about policing public morality). Obviously dont be a shitter and start spouting off trump supporters special brand of koolaid but if you feel like trans women should not compete with biological women in professional womens sports then you are free to think that way.

    • Dr Cog
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Speaking of speech:

      Using the word “retard” as a derogatory term is pretty offensive to those born with developmental defects. It’s similar to how we used to use “gay” in a similar way a few decades ago. It’s pretty shitty.

      • Suddenmoose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        you are free to feel that way but the mods are not free to ban me for my shitty vocab. they can just call me an asshole and move on like every other website

        • patchw3rk@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You are entirely in control of what you say… but it sounds like what you meant is not in line with what you’re saying.

          Do you deliberately want to belittle people with developmental issues? It doesn’t sound like it. I think what @Dr_Cog is trying to say is that you should consider lining up the words you use with the message you’re actually trying to convey.

          • Suddenmoose@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do you deliberately want to belittle people with developmental issues

            no one is attacking people with developmental disabilities by calling something retarded if you want to take it that way your are free to do so its your opinion not mine and even if you try to twist my words to suit your fucked up narrative i know what i mean and thats what matters to me

            • patchw3rk@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Sounds like you’ve had this conversation before and you are comfortable being on the merry-go-around.

            • Emotional_Series7814@kbin.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m honestly sure you don’t mean “retarded” as a personal attack against people with developmental disabilities.

              There’s also a very long history of people using that exact same word to attack them. Many people who make arguments like yours, that they should still get to use the word, tend to also be prejudiced against these people and treat them poorly. Maybe you’re not like that, but using that word does make you look a lot more like these people.

              You making an argument to try to keep using the word, even though it hurts people, essentially tells them “I will not change one word in my vocabulary to accommodate your feelings and history of being hurt by this word.” Your choice on if you want to change your words to in an effort to get people to interpret you in a way that better matches your intent, or if you’d like to stick to your guns even if it means lots of people will get hurt. After all, people are free to interpret words however they wish, including in ways that you don’t intend them to and ways you don’t mean. I don’t think it’s unreasonable for people affected by this word to not want you in their communities if you want to keep using that word, at least if they didn’t promise you absolute freedom of speech.

              • Suddenmoose@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hey if the mods want to remove folks like me so be it. Do i make extensive use of such slurs in my day to day vocabulary? (Not really) i mainly want to test the waters and see how hard the mods and the community comes down on me for it. Can i speak like normal or will i have to sing song dance around subjects like on reddit.

          • Otome-chan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If we’re to start declaring how people speak, can all you word nazis please start cracking down on those people who use the Q slur to refer to LGBT people? it’s a literal slur, has been used to attack and harm large portions of the community, yet people will happily broadcast it.

            I feel that’s a better use of time than pushing offense over the word “retard” which ultimately doesn’t hurt anyone and hasn’t been used to hurt anyone.

        • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Technically depends on the instance. The Fediverse supports free expression in the sense that you can spin up your own instance and say whatever you want. Flip side, any other instance can de-federate with your instance if they don’t want to listen to your BS^1.

          For instance, my instance^2 would probably police my ability to use slurs. Which is fine. I certainly am a member of some groups for which slurs exist, and if some asshole started spewing that BS in my house, I would express myself by kicking them the f*ck out. Likewise I chose an instance where I can be comfortable, and not have to deal with being harassed for who I just happen to be. My choice of an instance is largely founded on its Code of Conduct. In exchange, I extend the same courtesy to others on my instance.

          It’s almost like a social contract…

          Anyway, point being, as a consequence of different instances having different Codes of Conduct (even if just minor changes), you will technically be bound by both the CoC of your home instance and the home instance of the community/magazine.

            • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yep, the Fediverse can totally provide that. Self-hosting puts you in total control. I’m just making the point that free expression cuts both ways. Each instance is a free association of members who consent to that instances CoC. Each community/magazine has a home instance, and by joining that community you are also consenting to abide by that instances CoC.

              This does mean that in effect you can be banned from either the community or your home instance.

              Flip side of all this, is you have a bunch more variety of instances. You should be able to find one where you are comfortable, but still be mindful when participating in wider communities. You’re visiting someone else’s house in effect.

              Finally, instances can de-federate if they don’t want to deal with another instances nonsense.

        • Dr Cog
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t say anything about banning you, or stopping your speech. Just pointing out that most people look down on those who use that kind of derogatory language.

      • JasSmith@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Speaking as someone with a speech impediment, using the word “the” is super offensive to me. It’s basically a slur. If you don’t stop using it immediately, I have no choice but to report you for being a Nazi.

        • Dr Cog
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s sounds tough. You should probably not report people for generally benign speech, though, just because you personally find it offensive. Have you tried simply informing others of your problem with this language?

          • Otome-chan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would say that “retard” is less offensive than the Q slur used to refer to LGBT people. You say there’s a problem with calling stuff “gay” whereas I’m actually same sex attracted and have no issue with that. THe bigger issue is the Q slur.

            if you’re gonna just say “well my dictation of language is the only one that matters!” then you’re just being an authoritarian fascist nazi and are literally the problem.