• Zero@ezekielrage.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s because you don’t idolize celebrities and other famous figures enough to know what they do daily.

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There were a lot more people on Twitter than pop culture celebrities.

          In pretty much any field you can think of, some of its leading figures would be on there. Economics, urbanism, tech, astronomy, game developers, journalists, fan communities of essentially any creative work, communities for marginalized identities, pretty much any interest was well-represented there.

        • danielbln@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Garbage in, garbage out. I use(d) Twitter to follow a bunch of high profile Machine Learning and Software Engineering professionals, and my (non algorithmic) feed was rather useful and informative.

        • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I feel tabloid stuff gets pushed to me from everywhere, why should I go looking for more of that.

      • Swictor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was great for artists and scientists. My twitter feed was mainly filled with paleoartists and paleontologists bickering about the fullness of t rex lips and I sorely miss it.

        • danielbln@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m using Mastodon these days, and while not everyone from Twitter is there, bird.makeup fills the gap enough that it gives me a pretty similar experience.

  • Melonpoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did we really need a YouTube video to explain why one shouldn’t use meta products?

    • Raildrake@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really don’t get this trend of turning everything into a video. Is it supposed to be easier to consume?

      I would much rather read an article and get the information I want at the pace I want.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        My workplace has taught me that the majority of adults cannot read above a fifth grade level.

      • whenever8186@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep. If it’s a video it gets a hard pass from me. They can get their ‘views’ from someone else.

      • Caboose12000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        videos are easier to consume while doing something else. reading may be faster, but you can’t drive to work, do the dishes, workout, etc. while reading. if you’re not into multitasking then reading is the clearly better option, but I think most young people have grown up so surrounded by barrages of inormation from different sources all at once that multitasking comes extremely naturally to them

        • Raildrake@vlemmy.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have to say I also watch videos in background while doing other stuff, but that doesn’t make it a better medium to convey information, just more practical when the information is not important enough to be the main focus of someone’s attention, and that’s pretty subjective.

          But I do get the point, I just wish it was different.

      • mystic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        glad to know that I’m not alone who prefers to read articles over watching videos

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m avoiding it because I have Meta’s entire network blocked at my router. 😄

  • mysoulishome@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because Reddit in my opinion was the least worst social network until a month ago, now that I’m gone I’m not going to go signing up for another Zuckerberg/musk/spez monstrosity. I go on TikTok because I have a teenage daughter and we need something to talk about. Other than that…no. Federation/non-profit or nothing.

  • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, the fact that it’s made by Meta should be a good enough reason. I’m avoiding Meta like the plague. Fucking sucks that I need Facebook Messenger for school group chats though.

    • HidingCat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea, that’s the problem, I want to de-meta as much as I can, but real-life their network effect is so large you can’t not use them on some level. While I’ve not been using Facebook for years, I still have to use WhatsApp. xD

  • Puppy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I tried to use Threads but I couldn’t change my visible username without going to Instagram, which I never used in my life … and then I went to instagram to update my Threads profile but I couldn’t because I needed a Facebook account, which I don’t have. I found this incredibly frustrating and dumb so I uninstalled everything.

  • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Twitter was always trash. Why would I want to use a halfassed knockoff version from an exponentially worse company?

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Elron somehow made Twitter so bad that fake Zuckbook Twitter looks good by comparison.

  • goalless_banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m avoiding because is Meta, deleted FB and Instagram in 2015 and WhatsApp when they merged the accounts! Already blocked Threads domain on my Pi-hole!

    • ward2k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly if you’re using Lemmy all this information is already publicly accessible, any public forum isnt privacy friendly

      • Voytrekk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, the information we post here is public, but you can remain anonymous if you want.

      • Nahaelem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not talking about the public stuff, because that’s not where the money is for Meta. Here is the stuff the Thread app collects

        Now juxtapose that with what the Lemmy app collects.

        • fearout@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, it’s worse than that even. Tap on that block and see the whole list. There are like ~170 separate data points listed, it’s insane. They’re saving everything!

        • ward2k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sorry misunderstood your comment, yeah Threads/Meta is god awful for collecting data wouldn’t want to touch them personally

          There definitely is money in it for Meta though, just yesterday there was quite a popular post showing the types of data that is available to both users and instance owners. If one wanted to they could use things such as your upvotes and down votes to build a sort of profile about you, your political affiliations, interests etc

          Meta isn’t just a problem, ad companies can easily set up an instance to start collecting data from other servers

        • sharkato@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What’s surprising to me is that the android version of threads has no such requirements. It asks for contacts, camera, location, photos, notification, and mic permissions, and you don’t need to enable them to use the app

  • Ignacio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m avoiding it because:

    1. I live in the European Union. Yay!

    2. Either I have gazillions of followers, or I’m a mere leprous peasant not worthy to interact with.

  • Kururin@talk.kururin.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine using a product by Facebook. The same company which sold millions of its user data to ad company without their user knowledge. 🤡