• Marighost@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    What are the consequences of having a computer? Wouldn’t the Butlerian Jihad have outlawed things like calculators? 😉

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Do purely mathematical devices also count? I don’t know, but I can tell you that no mom-and-pop brick-and-mortar store in the galaxy is going to be able to afford the services of a mentat to do the daily math of the business.

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Although I’ve read the book and have issues with some of the choices on screen, this film absolutely feels like a labor of love done with the highest possible technical level, I truly, truly liked it.

    While watching the film, I was suddenly struck by the parallels between Stilgar and Morpheus from The Matrix. Neo is most definitely a Kwizats Haderach figure.

    • Wilzax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I really appreciate the mindfulness of the decisions made to adapt the film to the screen, nearly 60 years after the book was published.

      Chani being a non-believer made her relationship with Paul more compelling, especially when they made her part of the prophecy she rejects (although admittedly the way that was executed was a little corny). The reduced time spent at Sietch Tabr kept the pacing of the movie feeling consistent without the need for large time skip between films. And the rejection of Paul as emperor by the Landsraad makes the inevitability of Paul’s Jihad that much more apparent.

      None of these are changes that would have improved the book (except arguably about Chani’s doubt in the prophecy), but they definitely fit the film without really detracting from its central theme