Adobe’s new generative AI tools are here — and they really, really, pretty please doesn’t want you to use them to make porn, okay?

  • NotTheOnlyGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    And this is why software should always be offline and installed from media. My copy of Photoshop 6(CS1) doesn’t care what I do with it, it’s software that does a job. I’ve tried updated CS versions of Photoshop thanks to friends and other means, and frankly? CS1 does all of what I need or want, and very little of what I don’t.

    Working with software not installed and accessible on an airgapped offline machine is a bad idea.

  • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    This feels like a plausible deniability thing so when the creeps inevitably start cranking gross, illegal stuff they can shrug and say, “well we tried.”

  • readbeanicecream@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was curious how Adobe was going to monitor/enforce this. In the article:

    And again, outside of hitting users with an ever-classic “pretty please,” it’s unclear how Adobe actually plans to police this kind of material.

    Basically, they can’t. Maybe if someone was reported, their account can be deleted for violating a TOS. I feel like this is just an adobe CYA in the event someone creates nude photoshoot of a celebrity, so Adobe cannot be held responsible.

    • Voyajer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Since adobe firefly doesn’t run locally, they could just implement a classifier/tokenizer that looks at the image and gives it a “nudity” rating where if it is rated too high the service could refuse to send the generated image to the user along with logging the attempt.

      • quirzle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s expensive enough software they’d have to be damn careful about false positives that mess with actual productivity because it happened to include a lot of skintones. Seems like they’d either need an appeal process with a quick response time or deal with pissing off legitimate users with the occasional hiccup.