• ΛdΛm_𝒷@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      8 months ago

      I love how you took the time to write the years and title of the event… 😁😆😊🤍

      Wish there was a website or a wiki that document all this, these companies are basically using philosophical fallacies as a marketing strategy at this point

      • flipht@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        8 months ago

        100%. Most business is just advanced sophistry at this point. Marketing and advertising serves a useful purpose for new products, when the market isn’t aware that it exists.

        But by quantity and cost, most advertising is just social manipulation and is effectively an extra drain on the economy.

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yup, the logic people use to call Apple phones secure would put Fisher Price toy phones at the S-Tier of security.

  • Auzy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 months ago

    I used to sell apple gear at a reseller. They literally used to send messages to our customers for applecare.

    The difference is that Apple simply uses the data for it’s own benefit and competes against everyone (including people developing for their system)

      • Auzy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Definitely not saying Google is any better.

        But don’t forget, Apple gets billions of dollars from Google too, to be default webpage… So they’re totally complicit, and in practice, they’re effectively selling your user data to google.

        The biggest issue with Apple has always been their dodgy marketing. 20 years ago, they were living off the incorrect claim that “MacOS can’t get Viruses”, and now, seems to be just as dodgy with privacy.

        • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          At the end of the day, being as big as they are makes both of them malicious, manipulative and exploitative per default, otherwise they wouldn’t be multi-billion or even trillion dollar companies in the first place.

    • mindlight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Congratulations to you and the other 0.000000001% of Android users then.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I would like to think that the percentage of users who have grapheneOS is maybe 5% of the pixel population. I’m just pulling a number out of my ass right now but basically a lot of people who want the very best privacy and security go for graphene which is limited to only Pixels even though there are more cool phones like the fp5.

        • Avero@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Lineage is by far the most popular custom ROM and it has about 3.2 million active devices. Which is about nothing in comparison to 1.22 billion smartphones sold alone in 2022. Barely anyone uses third party ROMs.

        • Gunpachi@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          There are some people who use other roms like Lineage without the google apps. It’s not as good as Graphene but it’s better than the OEM version that comes with the phones.

  • 30p87@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    Buying or updating an app requires system-wide sign in

    Only if one uses the official play store. Which apple does not understand, ofc.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    was this old (the google logo is the old one so i’m not sure) or was apple just uninformed?

    you can have all sorts of multiple accounts in the control panel, mail and calendar all have on device log ons, you can update apps outside of the app store or use the google play store with your google account the same way you do with your apple account.

    • Snowplow8861@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Five words into the article says

      Apple’s internal presentation from 2013

      Literally at the top under TL;DR

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Given how they operate internally at the engineering level, probably just Apple being uninformed. The internal culture is total brainwash. Apple tech is the only tech. It is partly why they genuinely think they created technologies. They never stick their head out of the fruit to see what the world around them has, and they have a habit of buy, cheat, or steal to ensure their monopoly continues.

      Maybe an interesting sociological experiment? How technology evolves in a cult versus outside the cult back in the real world?

  • interolivary@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Well, it’s not like Apple doesn’t also collect pretty hair-raising information on you. Go digging through some of the sqlite databases on your machine and you’ll find eg. a social graph that even supports labels for things like political affiliations (I think this db was the one used by their ominously named “intelligence platform” service). Another db (which I think was for the knowledged daemon) has an incredibly detailed log of everything you do on your computer and phone, including eg. web URLs and millisecond granularity events on when you interact with your devices. Whether that social graph or all that other stuff ever leaves your devices is unknown (although eg. the knowledged stuff definitely does since I can see events for my phone on my laptop), but I wouldn’t count on it not being sent to Apple – regardless of what they claim.

    And yeah, sure, this is all to make “customer experience” better, but do you seriously believe that’s all they will be used for?

    Edit: and just as a side note, I’m not basing these claims on stuff I read online, but on actually having looked at the contents of those databases myself

      • interolivary@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Sure! ~/Library/IntelligencePlatform (associated with intelligenceplatformd) has a bunch with graph.db being the social graph, but with others like behaviors.db and eventLog.db also likely being relevant, and I think ontology.db was the one where they kept more information on the tags available for the social graph. ~/Library/Application\ Support/Knowledge/knowledgeC.db (associated with Spotlight’s knowledgeconstructiond, which I think used to be called knowledged in earlier versions) has the other stuff I mentioned.

        There’s also some system-level things in eg. /var/db/knowledgegraphd/ but I haven’t bothered looking into those yet because it’d require disabling SIP.

        • ElPussyKangaroo@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ok, I’m just gonna come out and say it - I messed up.

          I clearly have no idea what you’re saying, and I don’t even know why I expected anything even remotely simple to understand.

          I apologise for wasting your time, but thank you so much for this comment, however pointless it may seem now.

          • interolivary@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Oh you didn’t waste my time at all, no worries. It’s not like copy-pasting those paths from my terminal was all that much work, and it’d definitely have been better if I’d included that info right from the start. Unfortunately I couldn’t give any blog posts etc as a source, because as I said it was all based on my own poking around in those databases, but at least I could say where the databases were so others could do some poking around of their own if they wanted to

    • 420stalin69@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They’re not wrong.

      Apple has a better stance on data privacy than google because their profit model is being a premium consumer device whereas googles profit model is being a provider of ads.

      Apple’s incentives are closer to the consumer since they want to make the consumer happy while googles incentives are aligned with the trackers because that improves ad revenue.

      This changes the DNA of the OS.

      Plus the integration of googles data insecure services with android mean that as a matter of actual reality then discussing the security of android really means discussing the data security of those integrated services. It’s unavoidable.

      Don’t trust either of course but I simply do have more confidence my apple data isn’t being exploited as much as my google data simply because Apple doesn’t stand as much to gain and stands more to lose from being embarrassed on the issue.

      And pointing to custom android roms that replace google services with FOSS alternatives is a technically correct but still wrong answer to this because it doesn’t reflect the reality of the overwhelming majority of android users.

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        That is what they publicly say. However more than one company has discovered they can double dip: sell their premium devices and still track them. So long as they are not caught they get more $$$. I don’t know if Apple is, but it is a risk.

      • Jules [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        My ads got way less creepily targeted when i switched back to iphone. It’s not perfect but it’s the best option for people who don’t want tofuck around with degoogling and all that.

  • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The difference is that Google is collecting everything, while Apple can collect everything.

    Also, Android is not a “device”.

    Android and iOS are a massive tracking operating systems. Stick to deGoogled Android and Linux on mobile.