• Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m so sick of being stressed about the same thing over and over again. There needs to be a large scale investigation on the people that keeps trying to push this. I’m shocked there isn’t a constant media outrage to match these attacks. And I don’t hear anybody talking of codifying encryption integrity neither. It’s always just privacy experts discovering such attacks at the last minute seemingly by chance and trying to rally people against it in time. Does nobody in positions of power who care to stop these?

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Media targets the average citizen. Average citizens won’t easily understand the ramifications, so the media writes on clickable stories instead.

      • far_university1990@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Media could just oversimplify it: „the EU wants to know what porn you watch“, „this law allows your country to grab all your passwords“.

    • Gutless2615@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      My dude the Crypto wars get wheeled out again every few years and has for decades at this point. It’s so tiring.

    • zzzzz@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m shocked there isn’t a constant media outrage

      The media is generally owned by very wealthy people and, as a result, reports in ways that benefit the rich and powerful. Centralization of media is very bad for democracy.

    • pragmakist@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t had a chance to check anything yet, but given who (Mozilla) is reacting and how, I suspect this is just another case of EU authorities acting to protect their citizens from (American) corporate abuse

      • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t had a chance to check anything yet, but given who (Mozilla) is reacting and how, I suspect this is just another case of EU authorities acting to protect their citizens from (American) corporate abuse

        Not in this case. I suggest you read the open letter (which is signed by 335 scientists and researchers from 32 countries so far).

        Or, do you consider it to be corporate abuse when Mozilla prevents governments from using their certificate authorities to launch MITM attacks and impersonate websites for the purpose of intercepting internet traffic? Because that is what we’re talking about.

        • pragmakist@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Until I find the bloody proposal that none of it’s detractors seems to dare link to, I’m going to assume that I, as a citizen of EU, has a clear and present interest in not having Mozilla et al using their control of our browsers to block government services.

          I can do without my browser suddenly deciding that it doesn’t trust the fire department, thank you very much.

          (Or the pharmacy, or my doctor, or, or or at lot of things.)

          • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They haven’t released the text publicly but they’re voting on it in less than a week. That’s also one of the many objections that Mozilla et al has to this whole thing: it’s basically being done in secret in a way that won’t give the public any time to react or object.

            Historically, the browser vendors have only distrusted certificate authorities when they had reason to not trust them, not some arbitrary reason.

            One of the examples of them preventing a CA from being trusted is Kazakhstan’s, which was specifically set up to enable them to intercept users’ traffic: https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2020/12/18/kazakhstan-root-2020/

            Even if all of the EU states turn out to be completely trustworthy, forcing browser vendors to trust the EU CAs would give more political cover for other states to force browser vendors to trust their CAs. Ones that definitely should not be trusted.

            I think there wouldn’t be nearly the same level of objection if it was limited to each country’s CC TLD, rather than any domain on the internet.

        • pragmakist@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know whether it’s true.

          I am however confident that you don’t know either.

          But as for the “slightest” research, riddle me this: Why is there no link to the proposal in the article?

  • JackSkellington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    We just came from the chat control odissey. This is so tiring and unjust for those that have agitated lives. We re fighting against people who spend their work schedule entirely on this stuff.

    There isn’t much info on this.

    What can I do as an European citizen in this case???

    • Masimatutu@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you have the time, you could write to the member of the European Parliament who is responsible (Romana Jerković). Otherwise, the best you can do is probably to spread the word and remember to vote next year.

  • asudox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems like EU has two groups - one which wants to have mass surveillance and one which tries to protect privacy.

    • Masimatutu@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like to compare the EU to an overprotective parent – on the one hand, they want to protect us from all external threats, but at the same time, they want to know all about us and control us.