• dullbananas (Joseph Silva)@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe “anti porn” was too vague. Instead of being religious, fear mongering, or explicitly promoting a ban of porn, it basically tells people that life without porn is productive and feels good, and it recommends EasyPeasy.

      I went through life both with and without porn. I prefer it without, and I was not fully aware of what I was missing out on (and desperately needed) before I quit. So I want to spread information that people have the right to know.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Reasonable take i guess, maybe “anti porn addiction” is more accurate. Like any and everything in this world, the problem is not the substance but rather peoples inability to consume it responsibly.

        • ArumiOrnaught@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Like most addictions, it’s rarely the product that they’re consuming is the reason for addiction.

          Like how you get less drug addictions when you decriminalize drugs.

  • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’re hosting a website on a code repository designed for open source software? Why aren’t you using a webhost?

  • Lemuria@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    You don’t get the right to make decisions about other people’s pornography viewing habits.

    This is coming from someone who doesn’t consume the material, but still believes in the right to do so for other people, despite not exercising it.