- 28 Posts
- 4.16K Comments
Nein. Nur weil ein Prozess präziser wird, muss er nicht gleichzeitig effizienter werden. Es gibt mehrere Dimensionen, in denen Unterstützung passieren kann.
Das kann sie sein, aber nur zur Unterstützung der Menschen, nicht zum Einsparen derselben.
Again, “happy as a clam” is very informal. “Free as a bird” is much less so, so it makes sense it pops up more often in literature.
Wait, are they using Spongebobs toothbrush?
Most phrases have very small percentages, as they are measured against all other combinations of words in literature.
Since it’s an informal idiom, it’s also much more common in spoken than in written language.
Just airing out the goods, don’t mind her!
Ah yes, let’s just let our old and disabled die, they deserve it for being the way they are! This train of thought has always lead to morally impeccable results!
Please re-think what you’re saying, because it’s disgusting on so many levels that I can’t even begin to describe all the ways it’s horribly wrong.
And let’s not forget that Meta used their apps to track you in mobile browsers. Even having their apps installed for rare use is a terrible idea.
How are they monitoring and controlling my device when they don’t have MDM access to it? Again, I created the work profile myself. All my company IT could have access to are the Microsoft apps I’ve installed in the work profile which is separated & turned off when I don’t need it.
If I have a second phone, I need to keep it charged, remember to take it with me, and to turn it off after work. With everything integrated into my private phone it’s much easier for me.
Yes.
It works for some of my colleagues & doesn’t work for some others. You can also find bug reports in Microsofts trackers - they just don’t care.
Yep. “Code Snippets” recently stopped working for me (the overlay doesn’t open anymore), so I only have the two remaining ways. I can still do code blocks using three backticks, but inline code I can only do using the keyboard shortcut.
How they managed to fuck things up so badly is beyond me, and how they managed to keep them fucked up for so long is even further beyond.
Literally every week I encounter new bugs, it gets worse and worse. Many very basic features (like inline code with back ticks) just stopped working months ago and don’t work anymore. Scrolling in some channels is completely broken, jumping around wildly. Sometimes messages just don’t get sent (both on Android & Web). Sometimes calls work perfectly all day, then the next call just randomly changes audio device settings and I have to find what’s wrong again. Sometimes the video stream of a shared screen just doesn’t work, or stops working when switching to the small pop-up window while looking at chats, so the other person has to re-share. Sometimes the “available” state is just broken and keeps getting set to “away”. The search just doesn’t find many things, even when searching with fairly exact parameters.
It’s a daily source of frustration & literally gets worse by the week. I can’t remember a program that’s made me angry as much as Teams has.
I actually like the flexibility, but Teams is installed in a work profile that I created. This way I can turn it off when the work day is over. Very useful!
Sure, discipline can prevent some errors. But it’s always possible to run into wrong type assumptions, and I’d say type coercion and null/undefined access make up a fairly large percentage of non-logic errors. You can entirely prevent those using Typescript, which is why it’s so useful.
Static type analysis is always a good idea if you’re writing more than a couple lines. IMO Python is the worst offender with its
kwargsetc. - discoverability and testability is just so bad if you’re following common Python idioms.
1·3 days agoYes, that’s the restraint the writers are showing. That’s my point: the issue isn’t the multiverse aspect itself, it’s the replacability brought on by unrestrained multiverse implementations.
His future self opens a window and says “Hey, get some paper and a pen, I’ve got some winning lottery numbers for you!” and his past self goes “Oh boy!” and then immediately CLICK (closes the portal) before ever being shown the numbers.
Here’s your issue - it’s not the future self opening the window, it’s his past self. The future self can only speak through the window, but he can’t open it. So since the “current” self closes the window, the future self won’t be able to speak through it.
It unquestionably is excellent. Can you name another language in common use with a type system that’s close to the expressiveness of Typescript?
When they got it first, it was still white