
Jeg bryder mig ikke om begrebet “traditionel sexmoral”.
Det er lidt off topic, for det indgår vist ikke i selve undersøgelsen, men det lyder som en hvidvaskning af gamle holdninger.
Tradition og moral hænger sjældent sammen uanset om emnet er sex eller andet.
I min verden er moral noget som kan være rigtigt eller forkert, mens tradition er noget man gør uden anden årsag end at det plejer man at gøre.
Jeg ville bare ønske at journalisten havde fundet på en anden beskrivelse. F.eks. “religiøst synspunkt”.
Yeah the picture doesn’t really present the issue. The 60% livestock isn’t comparable to wild life. It’s much worse than that.
I could also say that 100% of bricks are man made and there are no wild bricks.
Similarly, live stock is a product, that shouldn’t and wouldn’t exist in the first place. It does not represent animals in a way that is comparable to wild life that have full lives.
The 60% livestock does not live long happy lives. It’s constantly being replaced by new livestock.
So sure at any given moment there might be 60% mass of animals classified as livestock, but if we were to count the actual number of animals over a year, it would be closer to 100%.