• 28 Posts
  • 3.03K Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月9日

help-circle
  • bstix@feddit.dktoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldsigh
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 小时前

    Yeah the picture doesn’t really present the issue. The 60% livestock isn’t comparable to wild life. It’s much worse than that.

    I could also say that 100% of bricks are man made and there are no wild bricks.

    Similarly, live stock is a product, that shouldn’t and wouldn’t exist in the first place. It does not represent animals in a way that is comparable to wild life that have full lives.

    The 60% livestock does not live long happy lives. It’s constantly being replaced by new livestock.

    So sure at any given moment there might be 60% mass of animals classified as livestock, but if we were to count the actual number of animals over a year, it would be closer to 100%.


  • Jeg bryder mig ikke om begrebet “traditionel sexmoral”.

    Det er lidt off topic, for det indgår vist ikke i selve undersøgelsen, men det lyder som en hvidvaskning af gamle holdninger.

    Tradition og moral hænger sjældent sammen uanset om emnet er sex eller andet.

    I min verden er moral noget som kan være rigtigt eller forkert, mens tradition er noget man gør uden anden årsag end at det plejer man at gøre.

    Jeg ville bare ønske at journalisten havde fundet på en anden beskrivelse. F.eks. “religiøst synspunkt”.












  • A dog without leash shows that the owner hasn’t bothered taking dog training classes or in the case of my country that they haven’t bothered learning the law. If they can’t be bothered to do that, I worry that they are not responsible enough to take care of the dog, and they shouldn’t be allowed to own a dog. Dog ownership ought to require a license or mandatory training.

    The person using the perfume might also not even know about the issue, but in that case, I don’t think it makes sense to blame the consumer. There are simply too many types of products that are potentially dangerous when used wrong. Perhaps the seller ought to have warned about it, but I doubt that would make much difference. You can still be upset about it being produced. Lots of things are like that.

    Sometimes you can blame the consumer and sometimes you can’t.


  • If you’re a mathematician how can you be dissing 5 like that?

    Less than? Hell no.

    5 is soo much more and soo many things that 25 isn’t and never will be.

    Without 5 you wouldn’t even have 25. Some might even say that 5 is the root of 25. Show some respect for the roots.

    Not only is 5 a beautiful prime number, it’s also the perfect number for a geometric shape. Everyone knows what a pentagon looks like. The Pentagon even named their institution as that. They didn’t name it after 25. Who the hell has ever heard of the icosikaiopentagon? Nobody, that’s who.

    Look at the American flag. It has 50 stars. Guess which shape they have? That’s right, each of the 50 states have stars with 5 points. Exactly 0 of them chose to have a 25 pointed star.

    You know what a bad number is? Yes: 25.

    25 is a shitty composite number. It’s shitty because it’s not even good at being a composite number; having only a measly 3 factors: One, itself and 5 (of all things, duh…)

    That’s because it’s square and boring. Does it even look square to you? This uneven 25 is supposedly a square. I never made a square of 25 things. What’s the fucking point in that? If I had to make a square for any purpose whatsoever, I’d definitely chose a better number with many more factors, so I could actually use the squaredness to divide things and mark mid points and what not. 4 is a square. 16 is a square. They’re so much better at being square than 25, because you can cut them in half and make a grid with a midpoint.

    So, yeah yeah, there are probably other numbers out there greater than 5, but it sure as fuck is not 25.


  • Norway did it in 2015, and it seems to have been a success.

    There has been surprisingly little debate about it here in Denmark. I haven’t heard a single argument against it.

    It should be noted that the draft is for training only, and that it’s possible for pacifists to opt out of the military training by doing work for other institutions.

    Personally I think it might be a great help for modernizing the military, because they’ll need to rethink the old “one size fits all” procedures.