I’m growing more and more impressed with its capabilities the more I use it! Wrapping my head around its approach to masking, and its “scene referred pipeline” took some time, but now that I’m getting the hang of it, I think I can say I genuinely prefer it to Lightroom.

Combined with digiKam, which is excellent for photo collection management, I’m a very happy photographer :)

  • raunz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m seriously doubting the image quality bit

    • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      In terms of noise reduction which greatly affects image quality it is nowhere near the big commercial players.

      • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Have you tried the “Denoise (profiled)” feature? It applies auto de-noising per your camera model and metadata quite nicely. You can then fine tune it after enabling the feature.

      • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve found the profiled noise reduction in Darkroom to do what I need. I’ve not noticed any significant difference between it and the results I was getting from Lightroom.

        • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That may be so, but Lightroom is not the class leader in noise reduction. There are other programs out there that do a much better job

          • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Cool, but I don’t need class leader… I need “works on my linux box without loss of functionality compared to my previous Windows workflow”