PugJesus@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago"Of course not - that might hurt my accelerationist dreams!"lemmy.worldimagemessage-square353fedilinkarrow-up1565arrow-down1121
arrow-up1444arrow-down1image"Of course not - that might hurt my accelerationist dreams!"lemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square353fedilink
minus-squareYeetPicslinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down8·edit-21 month ago why didn’t I think of this! Because voting isn’t a thing in China Lmao
minus-squareumbrella@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·edit-21 month agohas it been working well for you? is that the whatabaoutism i keep hearing about?
minus-squarePrinzigor@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·1 month agoBro, he is calling u a Chinese bot, whataboutism doesn’t apply in the slightest here. If you want to use debate terms, please learn when to apply them.
minus-squareumbrella@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-21 month ago“it doesnt apply when i’m the one being called out!” cmon, my dude.
minus-squarePrinzigor@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-21 month agoNo I’m telling you that that isn’t whataboutism. Is he calling you out? Yes. Is that whataboutism? No Whataboutism would be “Russia is committing war crimes in ukraine” “but what about natos expansion???” His argument is (arguably a very snarky) way of telling you that ur opinion is biased and therefore invalid. Do you notice the difference?
Because voting isn’t a thing in China
Lmao
has it been working well for you? is that the whatabaoutism i keep hearing about?
Bro, he is calling u a Chinese bot, whataboutism doesn’t apply in the slightest here. If you want to use debate terms, please learn when to apply them.
“it doesnt apply when i’m the one being called out!”
cmon, my dude.
No I’m telling you that that isn’t whataboutism.
Is he calling you out? Yes. Is that whataboutism? No
Whataboutism would be “Russia is committing war crimes in ukraine” “but what about natos expansion???”
His argument is (arguably a very snarky) way of telling you that ur opinion is biased and therefore invalid. Do you notice the difference?