Hawanja@lemmy.world to Videos@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoTrump Assassin Reactions & Misinformation SPECIALyoutu.bevideomessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down139cross-posted to: breadtube@lemmy.worldonlyvideos@lemmy.world
arrow-up1-34arrow-down1videoTrump Assassin Reactions & Misinformation SPECIALyoutu.beHawanja@lemmy.world to Videos@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: breadtube@lemmy.worldonlyvideos@lemmy.world
minus-squareYeetPicslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoAre you assuming he hadn’t watched demolition ranch before? Why? (Better be as good as the inverse logic of ‘he’s a viewer because he wears their merch’)
minus-squarejet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-22 months agoThe entire point of this discussion is about MISINFORMATION Making assumptions directly leads to misinformation. So the person trying to be clear about what is known and unknown shouldn’t conflate a shirt with a subscriber.
minus-squareYeetPicslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoIf we’re gonna use Occam’s razor we must make all things equal. That means thinking of all the possibilities before applying the logic sieve. Hence my counterclaim. Stop policing thought please.
minus-squarejet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoI’m not policing thought, think what you like, please I just want to be clear about what we have observed (know) vs what we deduce (speculate) our confidence may be high but it isn’t directly observed.
Are you assuming he hadn’t watched demolition ranch before? Why?
(Better be as good as the inverse logic of ‘he’s a viewer because he wears their merch’)
The entire point of this discussion is about MISINFORMATION
Making assumptions directly leads to misinformation.
So the person trying to be clear about what is known and unknown shouldn’t conflate a shirt with a subscriber.
If we’re gonna use Occam’s razor we must make all things equal. That means thinking of all the possibilities before applying the logic sieve.
Hence my counterclaim.
Stop policing thought please.
I’m not policing thought, think what you like, please
I just want to be clear about what we have observed (know) vs what we deduce (speculate) our confidence may be high but it isn’t directly observed.