• seeking_perhaps
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’d like to see a source for “what portion of feed they are given is also, largely, crop seconds or industrial byproduct”. The vast majority of information I have seen on this topic is that we produce more crops specifically to feed animals than we do to feed humans. Which, just from an energy perspective, is completely logical to me.

      • seeking_perhaps
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I don’t see how this supports your argument that eliminating livestock would not reduce land usage. 76% of soybean production is going to animal feed, do you really think that percentage would not reduce if you switched it over to providing food for humans?

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          69% is a byproduct of soybean oil production. most people don’t want to eat soy cake. some people already do, but not enough to eat the entire crop. giving that to livestock is a conservation of resources.

          • seeking_perhaps
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Sure, I don’t doubt that humans can’t each the entire soy crop in much the same way they don’t eat the entirety of other crops. But there is still 76% of the production going towards animal agriculture. You’re not seriously suggesting that livestock only use the leftovers from soybean production from humans and produce no additional demand, are you?

            • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              7% is fed directly to livestock. 85% is pressed for oil. the byproduct is the vast majority of what is fed to livestock.