- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.world
A YouTube prankster who was shot by one his targets told jurors Tuesday he had no inkling he had scared or angered the man who fired on him as the prank was recorded.
Tanner Cook, whose “Classified Goons” channel on YouTube has more than 55,000 subscribers, testified nonchalantly about the shooting at start of the trial for 31-year-old Alan Colie, who’s charged with aggravated malicious wounding and two firearms counts.
The April 2 shooting at the food court in Dulles Town Center, about 45 minutes west of Washington, D.C., set off a panic as shoppers fled what they feared to be a mass shooting.
Jurors also saw video of the shooting, recorded by Cook’s associates. The two interacted for less than 30 seconds. Video shows Cook approaching Colie, a DoorDash driver, as he picked up an order. The 6-foot-5 (1.95-meter-tall) Cook looms over Colie while holding a cellphone about 6 inches (15 centimeters) from Colie’s face. The phone broadcasts the phrase “Hey dips—-, quit thinking about my twinkle” multiple times through a Google Translate app.
On the video, Colie says “stop” three different times and tries to back away from Cook, who continues to advance. Colie tries to knock the phone away from his face before pulling out a gun and shooting Cook in the lower left chest.
Cook, 21, testified Tuesday that he tries to confuse the targets of his pranks for the amusement of his online audience. He said he doesn’t seek to elicit fear or anger, but acknowledged his targets often react that way.
Asked why he didn’t stop the prank despite Colie’s repeated requests, Cook said he “almost did” but not because he sensed fear or anger from Colie. He said Colie simply wasn’t exhibiting the type of reaction Cook was looking for.
“There was no reaction,” Cook said.
In opening statements, prosecutors urged jurors to set aside the off-putting nature of Cook’s pranks.
“It was stupid. It was silly. And you may even think it was offensive,” prosecutor Pamela Jones said. “But that’s all it was — a cellphone in the ear that got Tanner shot.”
Defense attorney Tabatha Blake said her client didn’t have the benefit of knowing he was a prank victim when he was confronted with Cook’s confusing behavior.
She said the prosecution’s account of the incident “diminishes how unsettling they were to Mr. Alan Colie at the time they occurred.”
In the video, before the encounter with Colie, Cook and his friends can be heard workshopping the phrase they want to play on the phone. One of the friends urges that it be “short, weird and awkward.”
Cook’s “Classified Goons” channel is replete with repellent stunts, like pretending to vomit on Uber drivers and following unsuspecting customers through department stores. At a preliminary hearing, sheriff’s deputies testified that they were well aware of Cook and have received calls about previous stunts. Cook acknowledged during cross-examination Tuesday that mall security had tossed him out the day prior to the shooting as he tried to record pranks and that he was trying to avoid security the day he targeted Colie.
Jury selection took an entire day Monday, largely because of publicity the case received in the area. At least one juror said during the selection process that she herself had been a victim of one of Cook’s videos.
Cook said he continues to make the videos and earns $2,000 or $3,000 a month. His subscriber base increased from 39,000 before the shooting to 55,000 after.
Can’t antagonize people going about their lives, either.
Is that really what you want? A world where being an asshole is a death sentence? No opportunities to turn yourself around?
I don’t want to live in a world like that, even if I find this guy an absolute tool.
Being a habitual asshole like that? I think it might be warranted. Nothing of value is lost by those people not being part of society any longer.
I’d rather at least try to rehabilitate a guy like him into a valuable member of society.
Nevertheless, it’s not unreasonable to want someone to understand that menacing and threatening someone for the lolz can potentially be hazardous to the health of the lolzer. And not always from the the lolzee, there’s that video from I think the UK where they are fake robbing someone, and a bystander punched the YouTuber in the head and split open his face.
Sure, no argument there.
In the US prison system? Not arguing for the prankster be killed, rather, I think it’d be better if that person be put away until they can be trusted to be mingling with other people again, for as long as it takes. I just doubt they’d be rehabilitated while in the US prison system.
That’s even ignoring how pranking fellow inmates would not go over as well as that prankster’s YouTube career has gone.
Edit: I forgot a crucial word in my last paragraph.
deleted by creator
Well that’s not at all what I said, is it? Stop extrapolating to get mad.
He wasn’t “being an asshole;” he committed an assault. The victim was entirely justified in defending himself.
Also, holy shit, self-defense against an active threat is nothing whatsoever like “summary execution!” There’s a huge difference between being forced to make a split-second decision when your own life is perceived to be in danger, and the state deliberately weighing the moral question of whether to kill someone after the situation has passed.