• retrieval4558
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    He’s done an OK job for a run of the mill president during run of the mill times, but in my opinion he has failed to rise to the big threats of today, especially RAPIDLY encroaching fascism, climate change, and nearly catastrophic wealth inequality.

    • CatfishSushi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      So our choice is between run-of-the-mill president or a guy who says he wants to a dictator, violently tried to overturn the last election, had fake electors etc. etc.

      I’m not excited about Biden but the choice seems to be pretty straightforward and I’ll be SURE to get to the polls.

      • retrieval4558
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m on board with voting for him as a means of harm reduction but I’m also not gonna pretend he’s been great like a lot of blue maga liberals claim.

        • retrieval4558
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Lol the downvotes. I said I’m voting for the guy, but y’all are so mad that I’m not going to dickride him as well.

          • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Meh, I upvoted you. I personally think he’s been about as good a president as someone could hope for, which is a pretty fucking low bar, but I still voted uncommitted in my primary yesterday even though I would crawl over broken glass to vote against Trump in November. I don’t blame anybody who holds their nose and votes as a pure harm reduction measure.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not excited about Biden but the choice seems to be pretty straightforward and I’ll be SURE to get to the polls.

        I will be getting to the polls as well but it won’t be to reward Moderates for picking a shit candidate and threatening not to back him every time there’s an opportunity for him to compromise with leftists and progressives.

          • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            When moderates are ready to compromise I’ll be here. We’ve done our part, it’s time for them to hold up their end of the bargain.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      The president has little power to address climate change/wealth inequality on his own. That all relates to the budget and is firmly in control of congress. Replace Manchin/Sinema with two progressive senators and you would have the BBB bill, which would have addressed both these concerns.

      With respect to encroaching racism I am just not sure what any politician can do about it. Ideally, you would like to change the mind of hardcore Republicans, but it’s not like they are listening.

      • retrieval4558
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Encroaching *fascism. I agree there’s probably not much to do about racism.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Democrats could have used the reconciliation bill in order to pass the BBB but they didn’t.

        Tells me all I need to know about establishment Democrats: they’re not on my side.

        • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          What part about Manchin/Sinema is difficult to understand here? How does that relate to Biden who pushed the bill?

          • retrieval4558
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m relatively unconvinced by laying all the blame on them. The president is the leader of his party and has the massive power of the bully pulpit to help bring them into line. He was unable or unwilling to do that.

            • Atyno@dmv.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Question: what party is Sinema in now?

              It’s pretty evident now Sinema could not be bullied if she was willing to immolate her career over even the soft demands made of her.

            • Natanael@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              And if he had used that “power” then he’d be called a bully, etc, (including by people who don’t give a shit when R does it)

              • retrieval4558
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Better not try then, that is the democrats MO after all

          • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Manchin/Sinema could not have stopped Democrats from using the reconciliation bill as a bargaining chip to pass the BBB. It was not called for by Pelosi, Biden or any establishment Democrat for one simple reason: They didn’t care and expected voters to just show up anyway.

            • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              What are you talking about? They needed 50 votes in the Senate for a reconciliation vote which they did not have, because of the aforementioned senators. The bill was passed by the house (of which Pelosi was Speaker at the time). There was a lot of negotiation between the White House and the two senators to get the bill to 50 in the Senate. None of what you are saying is correct!