AradFort@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoSweden charges Greta Thunberg for blockading oil portwww.bbc.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square217fedilinkarrow-up1957arrow-down118cross-posted to: europe@lemmy.link
arrow-up1939arrow-down1external-linkSweden charges Greta Thunberg for blockading oil portwww.bbc.co.ukAradFort@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square217fedilinkcross-posted to: europe@lemmy.link
minus-squareSirsnuffles@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI find it frustrating when people who are wrong, won’t change their minds. I don’t expect people who are devoid of reasoning to get behind anyone except themselves. Someone, I’m not invested in at all. With that being said, do you think it’s more reasonable to: Actually blockaid during a protest and get arrested, preventing future activism? Get media to spread an important message about some injustice, potentially gathering support for similar causes? Which one would be more effective, and why?
I find it frustrating when people who are wrong, won’t change their minds.
I don’t expect people who are devoid of reasoning to get behind anyone except themselves. Someone, I’m not invested in at all.
With that being said, do you think it’s more reasonable to:
Actually blockaid during a protest and get arrested, preventing future activism?
Get media to spread an important message about some injustice, potentially gathering support for similar causes?
Which one would be more effective, and why?