• Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Even Scalia said there are limits on the 2nd amendment.

    What military purpose does a bump stock have ?

    • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      What military purpose does a bump stock have ?

      Don’t know, don’t care, stop crying for our rights to be restricted

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m not opposed to all restrictions. I’m opposed to restrictions that make it hard for me to carry concealed for self defense. Bump stock are not something I’d use for self defense or fighting a government. As such I don’t care if it’s banned. That’s what the 2nd amendment is about. A bump stock isn’t an arm. It’s an accessory

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            4 months ago

            Be civil.

            The 2nd amendment isn’t being argued. A bump stock is not an arm. Have you read anything on the case? What is being argued is if it creates a machine gun. It does not.