The Supreme Court on Wednesday will hear a challenge to a federal ban on gun "bump stocks" in a case that could affect thousands of gun-owning Americans.
  • nac82@lemm.ee
    91·
    4 months ago

    And none of that applies to thoughts living in your head. You want to enforce your beliefs on everybody without any government process.

    Those beliefs is in regards to your right to deadly violence.

    You are a violent fascist who uses linguistics on democracy and constitutional republic to dismiss the violence you are advocating.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
      212·
      4 months ago

      What are you rambling about? You are making no sense.

      Can you be more clear what thoughts you are referencing ?

      I outlined the government process.

      And what violence am I advocating ? I have advocated for no violence.

      • nac82@lemm.ee
        81·
        4 months ago

        I recommend you read the thread if you are confused about the discussion.

        We weren’t discussing a political process. We were discussing your headcannon of the 2nd amendment and how it aligns perfectly with the stance of a violent fascist.

          • nac82@lemm.ee
            81·
            4 months ago

            I think the 2nd amendment was poorly written. I’ve read on it extensively and I don’t think it conveys the idea behind it. I think since the courts have further muddled the topic.

            THE LAW

            Lmao did you bring the rest of the circus with you?

            Repeating “you’re making no sense” is a poor form of coping since you can’t address things people actually said.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
              212·
              4 months ago

              Do you think the 2nd amendment conveys the right for a citizen to own a firearm without any ties to a militia ?

              • nac82@lemm.ee
                91·
                4 months ago

                I think you are desperate to change the topic rather than respond to the conversation honestly.