The threat suggests that Threads is the most serious rival yet to Elon Musk’s chaotic social platform.

  • ArugulaZ@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    So long, Mastodon. (On the plus side, so long Frank Speech, Truth Social, Gab, etc. etc. etc.)

    • blivet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, my first reaction to this story was, why didn’t they sue any of the other Twitter clones before this?

      • MoogleMaestro@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it’s a big waste of time and won’t get anywhere. The fact that mastodon has been a thing since 2018 (or earlier) unopposed means that they will have a really hard time proving that they ever had any trade ownership over the concept of microblogging.

        • Ragnell@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Given how fast this thing was put together, it’s very likely Meta actually DID use stuff from Twitter that was patented. Mastodon less likely, because it was built completely separate over a few years

          • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Writing a Twitter clone isn’t exactly hard, especially for a company that practically o center social media and already runs Instagram and Facebook.

          • ripcord@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Considering how fast this was put together sounds like all the other shit Musk has done with Twitter. Fast and half thought through. So far this seems meaningless.

        • Ragnell@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s also pretty likely Meta is using actual code from Twitter, though. It’s not an upstanding company and it put Threads together as fast as possible.

          Mastodon was put together over several years using open-source software and keeping open-source, so it probably genuinely doesn’t infringe on those patents.

          • Bobert@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I highly doubt that a company with the monetary force behind it that Meta has needs to steal code from Twitter. Besides, it’s made evident more every day that Twitter is the code equivalent of spaghetti and duct tape after Musk had his way with it.

            And what makes X upstanding in comparison to Meta? I mean I’m honestly not arguing in favor of Meta and Threads as much as I’m trying to paint the picture that this is Elon “I’ll sign an agreement buying Twitter for $44 Billion and attempt to fight my way out of it before the ink dries” Musk that is on the other side of this.

            • Ragnell@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh Elon’s a piece of shit. It’s just I am confident that in investigating either of them they are going to find any manner of bad behavior, but that if an open-source alternative had even a whiff of plagiarism it’d have been hit with takedown notices long ago.

          • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why would they need to use code from Twitter or even want to? They have hundreds or thousands of engineers to write their own, don’t necessarily use the same languages or tooling, and already have had IG, which works on the exact same model as Twitter, for a decade.

          • ripcord@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You seem to be equating source code use with patent infringement. They’re not really related.