The former president is now highly unlikely to stand trial in the Justice Department’s election interference case before November

The Supreme Court handed Donald Trump a massive victory on Wednesday by agreeing to rule on whether he is immune from prosecution for acts committed while he was president. The court will hear arguments on April 22 and won’t hand down a decision until June — which means it’s unlikely a trial in the Justice Department’s election interference case will commence before the election. If Trump wins the election, he’ll of course appoint an attorney general who will toss the case, regardless of how the Supreme Court rules this summer.

By Wednesday night, Trumpland was celebrating.

“Literally popping champagne right now,” a lawyer close to Donald Trump told Rolling Stone late on Wednesday.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I would argue that the two NY cases have gone exactly as you’d expect. Nothing has happened in them that was particularly unusual. Typical rape case + defamation and a corporate fraud case. All already with judgments.

    And as far as collections go, it’s not like buying groceries. He doesn’t have to pay the full amount all at once (and probably can’t). He does have to front the money if he wants to appeal, though, and all he’s done is file for one. They won’t take it up until he’s paid up.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes. The facts and conduct of the trial were typical, ordinary. I was not saying that rape is typical.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            How many rape cases have you heard of that get special, one-time grace periods to revisit 30 years later?

            ETA: this was not a criminal rape trial, it was a civil one. Jail time was never an option.