• MiddleWeigh@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thanks for clarification.

    I am confused cause I found :

    The law focuses on specific classes of driver’s licenses in Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island and Vermont. It doesn’t invalidate the licenses but rather classifications given to those without immigration status in the United States.

    That includes licenses with classifications such as “Not For Federal Identification”, “Driving Privilege Only” and “Not Valid for Identification

    “Not for federal indefication” is used for all non real id’s, right?

    So do these all now fall into their own classification regardless of legal status?

    Im still still confused.

    • Doomrabbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m guessing this is to catch commercial drivers with higher endorsements, possibly a semi or bus driver. States regularly have stricter licensing guidelines than each other, and Florida has added citizenship as a requirement. The listed states apparently do not check this.

      • MiddleWeigh@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah I think I grasp it now. So those states that don’t check legal status are now, by default, all getting classified on FLs end? It seems like a rather unnecessary contact point for our legal system, and has potential to be abused, outside of illegal immigrants.

    • aidan@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      From my understanding, non-real ID can still be used for federal identification- seeing as they can still be used to enter federal buildings and verify identity in other ways. It’s just viewed as a less standardly secure form of federal identification.