Hey there! I’m new to paper MTG and play Commander with my playgroup. We’ve been having a debate about whether the total value of a deck really indicates how strong it is. One of my friends argues that value doesn’t equal strength, but I can’t help but wonder when I keep losing to a deck with a higher price tag than mine.
I’ve been playing 1v1 games with my friend for a few months now, so I know their deck almost as well as mine. It can be frustrating when I can predict their moves but still can’t win with my basic deck. I understand the point that a couple of expensive cards in a deck won’t guarantee a win, but when a deck is upgraded with so many pricey cards, it feels like a whole different ball game.
For reference, we both started with precons, and both upgraded. I spent $20, they spent $120+. Inputing my deck list in a deck value calculator returns $103, which is lower than their upgrade alone lol
I don’t mind losing when the match is good. I hate losing when I’m always on the backfoot and can’t do much besides hoping to survive another turn
What are your thoughts on this? I’d love to hear different perspectives on the relationship between deck value and strength in the game.
edit: I received more responses than I expected, so I’ll need some time to go through them all and respond. Thank you in advance!
You know, I totally see where you’re coming from! It’s true that strength doesn’t necessarily increase in a straight line with the amount of money spent on upgrades. It’s just hard for me to imagine how their deck consistently beating mine after we both made improvements has nothing to do with the value of the upgrade!
Before we upgraded, our basic decks were pretty evenly matched, with me losing more often but still putting up a good fight and even snagging some wins here and there. But now, after we both made upgrades, I only managed to eke out a victory once when they had some seriously bad luck with mana and couldn’t play any of their cards