• HelixDab@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’ve avoiding the question.

    Would you be open to solutions that do not involve removing guns, or is that the only solution you would accept?

    • Anomandaris@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But it’s definitely only part of the solution, that alone is not enough, but nothing else will have a strong effect while so many guns are on the streets and easily accessible.

      No I didn’t, I think I was pretty clear. We need to reduce the number of guns available, nothing else will be effective until we do. I do believe any solution that does not involve removing guns at some point is incomplete. But removing guns on its own is not enough.

      • HelixDab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, you were quite clear; you aren’t actually interested in real solutions, you’re interested in gun control for the sake of gun control.