Edit: It looks like the argument here is that the US is not calling for an instant ceasefire, but instead saying that one is very important to have. China and Russia say it should be immediate. The US also tied it to hostage talks.

Another resolution is in the works to call for an immediate ceasefire, but the US is expected to veto it because they believe it could endanger hostage talks.

    • YeetPics
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Permanently blocking an immediate temporary ceasefire permanently forever because the US is involved and they’re not over the ussr failing hilariously in 1990 or being outmaneuvered for at least 60 years technologically in China’s case.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s some massive copium. Not that I’m a fan of China or Russia, but there’s a reason Hamas has been rejecting temporary ceasefires.