• time_lord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    We tried this already - getting ethics in game journalism.

    It didn’t work so well.

    • WldFyre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Can’t tell if you’re joking or not, but gamergate was absolutely not about “ethics in game journalism.”

      • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Did they edit their comment? Neither they nor the article mentioned gamergate.

        • WldFyre@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          “It’s about ethics in gaming journalism” was the common refrain for Gamergate proponents.

      • time_lord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not joking. It absolutely was about ethics, at first. The initial kickoff was the boyfriend accusing the girl (Zoë Quinn?) of sleeping with someone else for a better review. That’s ethics in a nutshell. I don’t think that anyone really cared about the game, or who was involved, but rather that the state of the industry was such that you could accuse a well known game reviewer of being unethical, and it was more believable than not.

        The fact is, reviewers had already sold their souls and a AAA game get anything less than a 90%. Had reviewers had better ethics, probably no one would have believed the boyfriend, and the entire story would have been a nothing-burger.

        Of course it went off the rails after that, the fact that the boyfriend was lying didn’t help, but for a brief moment it looked like there might actually be game news/review industry reform. It was a glorious 24 or so hours.