Not sure if this was already posted.
The article describes the referenced court case, and the artist’s views and intentions.
Personally, I both loved and hated the idea at first. The more I think about it, the more I find it valuable in some way.
Not sure if this was already posted.
The article describes the referenced court case, and the artist’s views and intentions.
Personally, I both loved and hated the idea at first. The more I think about it, the more I find it valuable in some way.
Did this ticket holder consent to this? Yes or no?
Yes.
By buying a ticket the buyer agrees to the rules the museum emoposes on its clients, including which exhibitions require an extra ticket or certain gender.
The lady’s only politic was made clear in advance.
Edit: Thinking about it a bit more… Why would you say that consent is needed here? Would you think that, say, a family only area would need consent from everybody who has no kids that they are okay with not entering?