Let’s talk about safe sex in Europe. It’s quite the big legal subject, but one needn’t get into all the details.

I’ll start with mine: Sweden

Fatherhood carries the responsibility for the childs livelihood, same as motherhood. A father who doesn’t live in the same household as his child and/or isn’t legal guardian will have to pay money to the child (or usually mother) until they are 18 or 21, depending on if they are still going to school. If the father does not pay, the government will pay instead, and then collect the money from him.

  • If a married woman is pregnant, the husband is legally the father. It doesn’t matter if somebody else knocked her up. If a married man wants to challenge his fatherhood of a child, he will in practice need the cooperation of the actual father to prove that he isn’t.

  • If an unmarried woman is pregnant, a man can sign up for fatherhood. If a man doesn’t, social services will have to examine who the father is. This can be done through various methods and if they fail to ascertain who the father is, but the pregnant woman says who it is, it will be taken to court. In court, as far as I know, the burden of proof is nearly non-existant.

In all cases, if a man is legally determined to be the father of a child, but disputes this, or suspects he isn’t, he will need the actual father to help determine that he isn’t.

What’s it like in your country?

  • cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sorry, I may have made an error or been unclear here. A man can ask for DNA testing if he thinks the child isn’t his. However, the mother (child actually, but spoken for by the mother) don’t have to cooperate with that, which means that if they are married, he’d still have legal fatherhood.

    • meteotsunami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, right. So assuming divorce is the second outcome of the pregnancy the man isn’t on the hook for someone else’s child? That’s definitely the reasonable take.

      • cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, that’s a strange thing. He can divorce her over the illegitimate child, but unless she doesn’t want him to, he’ll still have to pay for that child until it’s 18 or 21. And the bio-dad can’t insist it’s his child either, although I think parliament is looking to change that part.