We live in an age when the most unobjectionable and necessary ideas for progress can give rise to paranoia and fear. If the most innocuous, unoriginal possible idea can fuel paranoia, how can we hope to have a sensible discussion about the future of our places?

  • Rentlar@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love transit and I live less than 15-minutes from a bus stop, but last night it took 2 hours and 15 minutes to get home by the bus that would have been around 30 minutes of a drive. Just having a bus stop isn’t enough to make people consider switching. It needs to be at least reasonably competitive in time or price.

    Also car advocates always are sure to bring up their disgust with sharing their commute with nasty people or the homeless. That’s a tried and true method to drum up fear against a working, affordable transportation system.

    • frogman [he/him]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      if your public transportation has enough people living below the poverty line on it that it becomes distasteful to be on, then that’s separate issue and a disgusting reflection of the standard of living in the area. a person shouldn’t get a bus and feel like a social worker. however, this isn’t antithetical to good public transportation! it just recognises another social injustices that also need addressing.

      15 minute cities can and should be seen separately to public transportation though, in that everything a person NEEDS is limited to a 15 minute walk/cycle. a person hopes that public transportation is almost redundant for any daily travel you make (for most people), and that it is still to a high standard for when we do need it.

      • ArcticCircleSystem@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why does a lot of people who are below the poverty line using public transportation make it distasteful in the first place? They’re people like everyone else. ~Strawberry

      • EthicalAI@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        We should have fast and slow buses. One bus that stops at every stop along a route, another which goes a distance in a city only stopping at a few. That would greatly speed up transportation in my area.

        As for poverty, everyone should be able to go on the bus. IMO they should be free and taxpayer funded. I have no idea what to do about “undesirables” except that we need to fix homelessness and poverty.

        • OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          We already do in many places, they sound good in theory, but in practice aren’t much better. The problem with “express buses” is that they still have to sit in traffic. Really we need different modes of transportation, such as light rail, subways, dedicated bicycle paths, and so on, which do not share the road with cars. Otherwise, it’s much more difficult to make a value proposition for public/alternative transportation to those who can afford cars.

          • PostmodernPythia@beehaw.org
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bus rapid transit (lanes/roads entirely for buses) is cheaper than a subway, but provides many of the same benefits.