FenrirIII@lemmy.world to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months ago'Civil War' might be the year's most explosive movie. Alex Garland thinks it's just reportingapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up134arrow-down18
arrow-up126arrow-down1external-link'Civil War' might be the year's most explosive movie. Alex Garland thinks it's just reportingapnews.comFenrirIII@lemmy.world to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-23 months agoI went to see it. It’s very non-political. If you are expecting a satire, it is not. If you want to see the other side owned. You won’t. If you want to see how division is bad for the country, go see it. It’s a tense movie and well done.
minus-squarebramkaandorp@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoWhen you say “non-political”, what do you mean? The movie is about national division. I find it strange that any movie could do that without having any politics in it.
minus-squareBeMoreCareful@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoI went and saw it and would say the same. It’s not political. It’s really just sort of not about that. I’d absolutely suggest it, especially if you are familiar with Alex Garland.
I went to see it. It’s very non-political. If you are expecting a satire, it is not. If you want to see the other side owned. You won’t.
If you want to see how division is bad for the country, go see it. It’s a tense movie and well done.
When you say “non-political”, what do you mean?
The movie is about national division. I find it strange that any movie could do that without having any politics in it.
I went and saw it and would say the same. It’s not political. It’s really just sort of not about that.
I’d absolutely suggest it, especially if you are familiar with Alex Garland.