• andyburke@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    No, I think that for instance when you have the power to save a civilization, probably without them even knowing, and you fail to act you have acted immorally. Having a blanket rule is the immoral part.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Every time the tru to intervene it causes massive issues for the planets. Wven accidental shit like leaving behind a book caused a modster planet to form.

      They make contact and will do light trade with the locals if need be, but trying to force something on the planets only causes issues.

      • andyburke@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        None of these are cases I cited as being a good call and remember that my point is the blanket nature of the rule.

        • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          On the other hand if you add some leeway you might end up with a captain trying to justify handing easily weaponized technology to a planet because he just happens to have taken a liking to someone there.

          Given how horny Starfleet can be I fully expect there to be several civilizations that ended shortly after a captain found someone there to be bangable.

          • andyburke@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I agree.However I will take a handful of unnecessary wars if it means the universe.doesnt lose the potential of entire species because.someone.at starfleet has a god complex.