floofloof@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoCommodore 64 claimed to outperform IBM's quantum system — sarcastic researchers say 1 MHz computer is faster, more efficient, and decently accuratewww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1329arrow-down14cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1325arrow-down1external-linkCommodore 64 claimed to outperform IBM's quantum system — sarcastic researchers say 1 MHz computer is faster, more efficient, and decently accuratewww.tomshardware.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square25fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareHamartiogonic@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoSo, do you think that quantum computing has a much longer way to go?
minus-squareTreczoks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoI’m quite convinced that quantum computing will lead to exacly nothing. My bet is that the error factor will grow larger than the result scope, and not a single thing they try to stabilize will ultimatively make it viable.
So, do you think that quantum computing has a much longer way to go?
I’m quite convinced that quantum computing will lead to exacly nothing. My bet is that the error factor will grow larger than the result scope, and not a single thing they try to stabilize will ultimatively make it viable.