If I post nsfw onto a community hosted on lemmynsfw, for example, from the sh.itjust.works account, would that breaking the no pron rule, or not necessarily, since it’s posted on a different instance?

  • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of you post to an outside community, is not hosted on your insurance. It’s hosted where it’s posted.

    • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think that is actually true…

      OK let’s make a test. I have 2 accounts on sh.itjust.works, this is my lemmy.fmhy.ml account. I’ll attach a pic, see where the link points to.

      The link says lemmy.fmhy.ml 🤷.

      • tasbir49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        The potential liability for instance owners due to this is massive. Images should be stored in the instances of the community they’re posted to.

        • ericjmorey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s fundamental to the design of Lemmy’s implementation of federation via ActivityPub that all content from an account be hosted on the account’s instance.

          • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If it’s an ActivityPub feature, this is somewhat of a poor design if you ask me (or at least not being able to change this). He’s right, this feature could put instance owners in legal problems, because the data in question is actually stored on their server, not the server that you posted the image on.

        • sirdorius@programming.dev
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Indeed, this is a huge design flaw. You would basically have to police everything that users post on other instances as well. Do you even have moderation tools for this?

        • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, you’re right… but I think the problem is, the login info… but, than again, how could it store copies of my post, but not images.

          In any case, I do agree that this is something that should be looked into and discussed in length.

          • average650@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t see why the login info is an issue, and storing a copy of a post wirh just a link to an image makes sense.

            • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I really have no idea how other instances actually confirm that you’re posting from another instance, not just emulating that you’re a user on another instance. That might be a part of ActivityPub, but I haven’t looked at code, wouldn’t know.

              • your@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                This is part of the ActivityPub protocol, but I haven’t looked into it enough to know how it’s defined.

      • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Huh. Well that just makes no sense structurally. Thanks for pointing it out though.

        How does this thing work at all? You would expect it to all be hosted to the site the community is hosted on. So now when a comment thread is fetched, it has to go to all these other servers for every single comment from another instance. This is actually mind-boggling.

        Does anyone have an ELI5 for why it’s done this way?

        • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Actually, the post content is saved on the instance where the post is posted as well. That post is called a copy, the original resides on the poster’s originating instance. But, not the media, no, that resides on the instance where the poster resgistered.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Basically everything goes through your instance. If you make a post, it goes to the copy of the community that’s on your instance. Likewise if you comment. If you join a community, your instance starts listening for changes and stores those on the instance.

          That way if another instance goes down, you still have a copy of all of the content there that someone on your instance is interested in. So that way pretty much everything is backed up.

          I personally think we can do better, but it’s an easy enough system that all but guarantees that content doesn’t disappear. You could even set up an instance that never deletes anything if you want to make sure you don’t lose any data.