• Max@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    The other option is a housing coop. Where you still rent, but it’s owned by all the renters collectively.

    • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      A co-op is not renting. It’s basically a building with condos/apartments that has a built in HOA. If the roof needs repaired every apartment needs to chip in for the sudden payment if the co-op isn’t properly saving for those capital expenditures.

      • Max@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are a great variety of co-ops. If you define renting narrowly enough, then they are of course different. But the point is that for some (and the co-ops I’ve seen personally) you don’t have to make a down payment for a mortgage like you do with a condo or house. You instead pay a monthly fee that covers the co-op’s mortgage/repairs/taxes. Or if the place is fully owned by the co-op, then just the repairs/taxes.

        But you retain the flexibility of renting in that you can leave reasonably easily since you’re not personally responsible for the mortgage.

        I think there are also co-ops (possibly more commonly) where it’s essentially just a condo where the building is collectively owned by the tenants instead of a for profit company. In that case, it’s much less like renting.