As expected, Cannon is giving Trump what he wants.

  • LEX@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Of course! She should never have been allowed to oversee this case. Not sure what Smith was thinking by not challenging her assignment.

  • HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder if Cannon is panicking on the inside from imposter syndrome every day of her life in her appointment, or if she has like, a calm sense of self-assurance that this is right, she was appropriately promoted to this role, this is God’s reward and blessing for a loyal servant?

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      her credibility is going to be shot if she gets bitch slapped again by the higher court.

      • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        She won’t care. Not in the slightest.

        She can only be removed through the same impeachment Donald Trump just skated through, twice. There’s no chance that her job status will be affected in any way. And if Trump, or possibly any other Republican, gets into office, this trial is basically an audition for Clarence Thomas’s seat on the SC. She’ll have the unwavering support of a good chunk of the people in her area and probably a good 25-30% nationwide. If she does decide to step down at some point, the right-wing hate machine will have a bidding war for her as a consultant.

        Sad but true fact: There’s a very good chance that throwing the trial for Trump would set her up for life.

        • QHC@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s also a very good chance that Trump is not going to have much influence if he keeps racking up indictments, some of which he can’t pardon even if he wins the election, which is also not a foregone conclusion. Why risk her career on a move that wouldn’t actually matter in the end?

      • HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree but that’s so far down the line and “the damage will have been done,” by then so to speak.

        The two big issues of this article are 1. Start time of the trial, which Cannon has agreed that mid-December (5 months from now!) is too early; and 2. That Trump can’t get a fair trial while he’s campaigning (Cannot didn’t agree to this).

        Let’s say the trial doesn’t start until after March when Trump is the obvious front runner for the RNC after Super Tuesday. His next ploy will be “I can’t campaign enthusiastically while this trial is going on, so delay it,” and Cannon may/may not allow it. Then heaven forbid Trump is elected president again, he will claim his position is now completely beyond reproach (there’s another submission in this magazine to a video explaining that this is his stated goal) and so now he’s exempt from being held accountable through this trial at all.

        Even if this court case was wrapped up before November 2024, he’s going to challenge any outcome that doesn’t exonerate him. And yes, a higher court would comment about how this shouldn’t have ever received the first delay and should have started in December 2023, but what all machinations have transpired in the background while that appeals trial is happening and being decided?

        • Phlogiston@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          yes yes and yes.

          I’m only here to add: if he gets elected again he will absolutely 100% pardon himself. I figure if another Republican gets elected there is still a high probability of a pardon if only “so the country can heal” (or some such bullshit).

          (Obviously only for federal cases)

          • QHC@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Trump would also 100% pardon himself for a state conviction and just dare the country to hold him accountable. If he gets that far, it would probably work.

          • HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            (Cool user name. I remember Karl Popper from my philosophy courses)

            There’s a certain catch 22 with presidential pardons though: the pardoned accepts their guilty verdict, they are just absolved of the legal punishment phase.

            I don’t think Trump could get over that first hurdle, though he is best characterized as playing both sides on anything that benefits him, so I’m sure he’ll try.

            • QHC@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              he would just lie and say that accepting a pardon from himself isn’t admitting guilt, he had to do it for <insert stupid reason>.

    • unconsciousvoidling@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ll go with the Dunning–Kruger … this is gods reward version that she tells herself. There’s no way she’s self aware of how rotten she is. I think they knew this when they appointed her.