• Eheran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    No, not at the cost of some dying. That just randomly happens. The same way anything happens while doing anything. Babies are born in airplanes. That does not mean that they are delivery rooms.

    • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Maybe you’ll understand it clearer like this: There are no side effects, their are only effects.

      Whatever something does is whatever it does, we have intentions with things but our intentions don’t determine reality. If a system has effects we do not like our only recourse is to change the system, we cannot convince it to be other than what it is.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        So then everythings purpose is to do everything. No matter how seldom sometime happens in connection with something, that is it’s purpose. What a useful definition.

        • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          you understand that there’s a difference between causality and coincidence right?

          Chairs cause weakening of core muscles which can lead to injury, chairs are frequently found in buildings that catch fire however they are unrelated to the fires.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Not according to your definition. My childhood house burned down because of an electrical fire. So according to your logic, the purpose of electricity is to burn down homes. It’s absurd.

            • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yes, the system of electrifying houses is to enable widespread use of electrical devices at the cost of a few electrocutions and fires.

                • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I don’t know who we is here, by the blithe arrogance I’ll assume usa.

                  Presumably because people decided there were too many electrocutions and fires and so modified electrification of houses to reduce that? What do you think you’re point is? It’s not that people are gleefully throwing children into fires for their TVs, it’s just that stuff does what it does.

                  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Sweet. So the point of electrification is to power homes, with a side effect of burning some down. But we can try to improve electrification, so fewer homes burn down. And over time, as we’ve improved the system, fewer homes have burned down.

                    The purpose of the system is not to burn homes down. The purpose of the system is to power homes. Some homes burn down, but that doesn’t mean that by using electricity we’re okay with that. And it doesn’t mean we should abandon the idea of electricity. It means we should take the system and try to improve it.

                    Now we can bring that back to our current democratic capitalist social system. Democracy and capitalism are systems that sometimes produces death and misery. Death and misery is not the intent of the systems. We can still use the system without accepting that death and misery are a natural part. Instead, we try to improve the system. Not tear it down, improve it. And it has been improving. Not steadily, it jumps forward and then falls back at times, but over time there’s been a general upward trend in happiness and quality of life. People in the 2020s have a better quality of life than people in the 1920s, who had a better quality of life than those in the 1820s. We’re making things better. We don’t need to tear it down.

          • Eheran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            The whole point of the previous examples was to verify this is the logic. Why are your examples now specially not affected? Why is the purpose of the chair not to weak for muscles?

            • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              The chair is to enable comfort at the cost of weakness, but not house fires.

              you have appalling reading comprehension.