I love the idea and goals, but just reading the headline, I immediately leaped to one thought. Reading the article, they eventually addressed it.

In week two, we were somewhat surprised to find aquatic life – water fleas and mosquito larvae darting about under the surface.

If we don’t go to great lengths every season limit every opportunity for mosquitoes to breed, our backyard is miserably unusable for half of the year.

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not convinced reducing a human disease is worth the destruction of those environments. It’s not all about us and that warming you mentioned is a direct result of us acting like it is.

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are also other ways to deal with mosquito populations that don’t involve destroying the habits of other animals.

    • Iceblade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I fundamentally disagree. Our mastery over nature is what allows us to even care about such esoteric things. As a humanist, I consider climate change a problem because it poses a threat to humans, much like mosquitoes do.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If we really had mastery over nature, we wouldn’t have a lot of the problems that we do. And the potential threat to us is my whole point; upsetting certain balances could be very bad for us. I don’t think we understand enough about life to be able to say what the effects of eliminating entire ecosystems are, let alone whether they are worth it.