There are no ethical choices under first-past-the-post voting. We must instead make a decision that reduces the most harm.

  • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    No, I am serious. If people have an ethical concern about voting in the US, this is my response. It’s comparable to no ethical consumption under capitalism. Vaush explained the idea in one of his streams.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Vaush explained the idea in one of his streams.

      Yeah, I quit watching him. Dude is pretty problematic. “Genocide is bad and wrong, but still vote for Biden, because party loyalty is more important.” At least he has the balls to criticize Biden, which is more than I can say for some people.

      • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Vaush isn’t perfect, but no one is arguing party loyalty is what is important here. There are no ethical choices in FPTP voting so we have to make a decision that reduces the most harm.

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          This is the fun part about arguing with Russian agents and people who drank the kool-aid, they shove words into your mouth. Either they’re deliberately trying to make you look bad, or they’re so stuck in their own world view they can’t hear anything other than what they already believe.