The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 7 months agoFatherly hazinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square248fedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down127
arrow-up11.11Karrow-down1imageFatherly hazinglemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 7 months agomessage-square248fedilink
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·7 months agoNah. Don’t sell yourself short. Your explanation is accurate and to the point.
minus-squareRevan343@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoWell thank you for the vote of confidence, but no, your explanation is much better; mine was basically a summary, while yours is in-depth
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoDue to how my brain works (ADHD), I specifically have trouble with being concise. So, despite what you may think, I find your accurate and concise explanation to be excellent.
minus-squareRevan343@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoWell fine then, let’s both prefer each other’s answer :P Honestly, I am glad you liked my simplified explanation; I greatly appreciated your in-depth explanation. Also, Lemmy is great, here we are arguing that the other guy’s answer is better; on Reddit we’d be having the opposite argument
Nah. Don’t sell yourself short. Your explanation is accurate and to the point.
Well thank you for the vote of confidence, but no, your explanation is much better; mine was basically a summary, while yours is in-depth
Due to how my brain works (ADHD), I specifically have trouble with being concise. So, despite what you may think, I find your accurate and concise explanation to be excellent.
Well fine then, let’s both prefer each other’s answer :P
Honestly, I am glad you liked my simplified explanation; I greatly appreciated your in-depth explanation.
Also, Lemmy is great, here we are arguing that the other guy’s answer is better; on Reddit we’d be having the opposite argument