everyone has a bias. and i’d much prefer and trust a wiki that openly admits to its Marxist-Leninist bias, rather than a wiki that refuses to admit that it has a neoliberal bias.
Everything has a bias. Is that a bad thing? Not necessarily.
Hence, the source of formation of the spiritual life of society, the origin of social ideas, social theories, political views and political institutions, should not be sought for in the ideas, theories, views and political institutions themselves, but in the conditions of the material life of society, in social being, of which these ideas, theories, views, etc., are the reflection.
The Man of Steel.
In Capitalist society, political institutions all have a pro-imperialist pro-capitalist bias. Under Socialism, political institutions have a pro-socialist, anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist bias.
Who uses conservapedia as if it was a reliable source
This is a real conservapedia article:
I think Prolewiki has an intellectual advantage here.
What the fuck 😭😭
damn bro
I kinda ask that of any wiki that wears it’s bias on it’s shoulder 🤷♂️
everyone has a bias. and i’d much prefer and trust a wiki that openly admits to its Marxist-Leninist bias, rather than a wiki that refuses to admit that it has a neoliberal bias.
“your bias is lame and my bias is superior.”
Whatever you say, fella.
It’s called conservapedia I’m pretty sure they’re aware of their bias lol Their level of awareness of the grift is what’s concerns me more.
i was talking about
WikipediaNATOpedia having a neoliberal biasEverything has a bias. Is that a bad thing? Not necessarily.
In Capitalist society, political institutions all have a pro-imperialist pro-capitalist bias. Under Socialism, political institutions have a pro-socialist, anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist bias.