• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    8 months ago

    Man ass is verifiably less offensive to religious types than any part of a woman being visible.

    • meco03211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’d churn my own butter at the sight of a woman’s bare ankle bone. Best to just punish women for that. It’s impossible to control my own urges.

      • daltotron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’d churn my own butter

        vile, never heard it said this way before, I’m stealing this for personal use

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Because Catholicism.

        Catholics believe that any sexual activity that doesn’t have a chance of making a baby is sinful. Gays obviously can’t make babies as a normal part of their love making, so that’s where the whole ‘being gay is sinful’ bit comes from

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Because they find gay sex unappealing, seems to be the main reason. If you point out that that is simply because they’re not gay, they are unable to understand the point.

      • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s the enjoying part that is frowned upon. They assume everyone loves seeing boobs so they must be punished for that. A bare man ass is comical at best for most. If they thought people were enjoying it they must be punished