• IndiBrony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re referring to the fact that pretty much everyone in the comments defended why we still use QWERTY over any different keyboard.

      Usually when people say “Big ____” they’re referring to giant corportations pushing their agendas for profit against the wellbeing or benefit of society. In this instance, it’s certainly being used in a tongue-in-cheek manner.

      They’re joking essentially that people who vehemently defend qwerty are perhaps a little brainwashed.

      It is known that there are keyboard layouts which are more efficient and faster (qwerty came about as a means of preventing typewriter arms from hitting each other), but none have become mainstream because everyone’s used to qwerty.

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Contrary to popular belief, the QWERTY layout was not designed to slow the typist down,[2]: 162  but rather to speed up typing. Indeed, there is evidence that, aside from the issue of jamming, placing often-used keys farther apart increases typing speed, because it encourages alternation between the hands.[11]

        A feature much less commented on than the order of the keys is that the keys do not form a rectangular grid, but rather each column slants diagonally. This is because of the mechanical linkages – each key is attached to a lever, and hence the offset prevents the levers from running into each other – and has been retained in most electronic keyboards.

        • TonyTonyChopper
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I don’t care what anyone else says, alternate layouts are awesome

          edit: actual ones like Colemak and Dvorak, not whatever AI tech bro garbage this guy is peddling