I have a very, very old laptop with me. I don’t know the exact specs, but it has a single core celeron processor and 4GB of RAM. It’s an old little thing, maybe 15 years old.

I installed Debian on it with LXQT and it was chugging hard. I don’t expect it will run modern browsers anyways, so give me your best distros that can run on a potato and have a GUI.

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    So your HDD may be failing if debian is chugging at the desktop.

    Try swapping it out with a cheap SSD.

    Aside from Debian, you could experiment with the 32bit version of mint.

  • jared
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve got MX on a old EeePc and never had a problem.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s not a potato, that’s a fossil.

    Arch with LXQT, maybe? Then you can choose to install specifically what you want with minimal overhead. Another option is the minimal version of NixOS, but like Arch, you’d need to install a DE separately, and you’d need to learn how to use Nix.

    But if it’s still struggling, might be best as an art piece or command line only, given that a Raspberry Pi 4 and 5 can be had for <$100 and neither struggles with lighter DEs or browsers.

  • caos@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Q4os with Trinity desktop really needs little RAM and runs fast even on old devices. The desktop is a bit old-fashioned, but ok. You may also try lighter browsers, perhaps Palemoon.

    But 4GB is actually not that little, almost all distros can run well with it, especially rather slim ones like Debian lxqt. maybe it’s really due to the hdd.

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Is gaming the main use case? If so, I think the distro won’t be the biggest performance factor.

    If gaming is not the case, I would ask myself this question: Is a desktop environment a must? Because you’d be surprised by how much you’re still able to do without one.

    • simple@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      This thing definitely won’t be gaming, but I’d like to maybe play videos (probably at a low resolution) and mp3 files at least.

      Edit: Oh, I just realized I posted this in the gaming community and not just linux

      • neidu2@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        In that case I’d go for something very barebone. Get a minimalistic debian up and running, and see how that works. There are plenty of lightweight desktop environments (to the extent some of them count as desktop environments), where TWM is an extreme example.

  • CocoLopez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    You can try Void. With 4 Gb it should be a breeze. I’m rocking it on a netbook with an atom processor and 2 GB of ram and I use Firefox on it without any issues.

  • veng@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I had a net top thing from asus that had worse specs than that running fine a few years ago on AntiX. It was just used as a thin client mostly but did the job.

  • f00f/eris@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Debian can still work, but you’d have better chances with legacy LXDE, or starting with no DE and installing IceWM.

    Q4OS Trinity, antiX, and Damn Small Linux are all Debian derivatives known for being able to run on very old systems, and they’re among the most lightweight distros I know that are still functional for most purposes.