Guilty on 34 counts.

In a historic verdict, Trump was convicted of falsifying business records in connection to a hush money payment to Stormy Daniels.

  • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 month ago

    FUCK YES.

    Good job, jurors. Now it’s up to the courts and justice system to actually do something about it.

  • Midnitte@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    Astounding to me that the Speaker of the House called a trial by a jury of Trump’s peers a “political stunt”.

    It’s the rule of law, asshat.

    • Gsus4
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Happy cake day! (and lock him up day)

  • Kwakigra@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    From CNBC:

    The charges against Trump are Class E felonies, the least serious category under New York law. Each count carries a maximum sentence of four years in prison.

    Experts tend to think it is highly unlikely that Trump will face any jail time as a result of the hush money verdict. “I’d be shocked” if Trump is sentenced to jail, Bachner said. He added that a sentence of probation would be normal for the average defendant convicted of the same crime. [Judge] Merchan has made clear throughout the trial that he is mindful of Trump’s unique political status, and he has previously expressed reluctance to put the ex-president behind bars.

    Gershman told CNBC that a jail sentence is “certainly plausible,” and that it “would not be out of bounds” for Merchan to sentence Trump to some time behind bars. But he acknowledged that, due to the immense and complex challenges of incarcerating a former president, the judge might instead opt for a sentence of house arrest. “This case goes to the heart of our democracy, according to the judge,” Gershman said. “He views this case as very, very serious.”

    • Drusas@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      I understand the sentiment, but it is important for felons to be allowed to run for office. I would also say that the vast majority of them should be allowed to vote as well (I would only take that away in cases which involve acts against democracy, election interference, etc–which, incidentally, this was).

      Sometimes the law is wrong. How many people are felons because they smoked pot, for example?

      • Gsus4
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Meh…the felon population is not supposed to be large enough to influence elections…looks up incarcerated numbers…Louisiana/Oklahoma/Mississipi: nearly 1%…ok…new voting group: the incarcerated…but…who wants to fight for that vote?

            • Che Banana@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              because once you take the right away from a group, somehow laws are written and enforced to make targeted population into that group. Look at drug laws. Oh, you have 2 Marijuana cigarettes? 20 years and no vote for you drug kingpen.

              • Gsus4
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Wait, the rates of incarceration in Louisiana are because of pot? Yeah, that’s fucked up.